Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hopkins, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Reuter, R. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Seed Production

Spring Grazing Reduces Seed Yield of Cool-Season Perennial Grasses Grown in the Southern Great Plains

Andrew A. Hopkins*,a, Eugene G. Krenzerc, Gerald W. Hornd, Carla L. Goade, Larry A. Redmonf, Daren D. Redfearnc and Richard R. Reuterb

a Forage Biotechnology Group, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
b Agriculture Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
c Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
d Dep. of Animal Science, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
e Dep. of Statistics, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
f Texas A&M Agric. Research and Extension Center, Overton, TX 75684



View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Arrangement of no spring grazing (NG), limited spring grazing (SG), and extended spring grazing (SG+) treatments in paddocks of smooth bromegrass, pubescent wheatgrass, and orchardgrass at Marshall, OK. Location 1 and Location 2 correspond to those paddocks described by Reuter and Horn (2002). Not to scale. {dagger}R = replication.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Relationship between seed yield and number of spring grazing days for orchardgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, and smooth bromegrass.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between seed yield and number of days between grazing termination and seed harvest for orchardgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, and smooth bromegrass.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between seed yield and number of days after first hollow stem that grazing occurred for orchardgrass and pubescent wheatgrass.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.