Spring Grazing Reduces Seed Yield of Cool-Season Perennial Grasses Grown in the Southern Great Plains
Andrew A. Hopkins*,a,
Eugene G. Krenzerc,
Gerald W. Hornd,
Carla L. Goade,
Larry A. Redmonf,
Daren D. Redfearnc and
Richard R. Reuterb
a Forage Biotechnology Group, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
b Agriculture Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, OK 73401
c Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
d Dep. of Animal Science, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
e Dep. of Statistics, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
f Texas A&M Agric. Research and Extension Center, Overton, TX 75684

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Arrangement of no spring grazing (NG), limited spring grazing (SG), and extended spring grazing (SG+) treatments in paddocks of smooth bromegrass, pubescent wheatgrass, and orchardgrass at Marshall, OK. Location 1 and Location 2 correspond to those paddocks described by Reuter and Horn (2002). Not to scale. R = replication.
|
|

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Relationship between seed yield and number of spring grazing days for orchardgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, and smooth bromegrass.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Relationship between seed yield and number of days between grazing termination and seed harvest for orchardgrass, pubescent wheatgrass, and smooth bromegrass.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Relationship between seed yield and number of days after first hollow stem that grazing occurred for orchardgrass and pubescent wheatgrass.
|
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.