Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carlassare, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karsten, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carlassare, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karsten, H. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carlassare, M.
Right arrow Articles by Karsten, H. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Species Population Dynamics in a Mixed Pasture under Two Rotational Sward Grazing Height Regimes

M. Carlassare{dagger} and H. D. Karsten*

Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences, 116 ASI Building, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Orchardgrass tiller density, (b) tiller dry weight, and (c) herbage mass at each grazing period in a mixed pasture rotationally stocked with cow–calf pairs under tall or short grazing height regimes at State College, PA. Vertical bars indicate 1 SE. (a) Tiller density differed significantly with grazing regime x grazing date and grazing date (P < 0.1); (b) tiller dry weight differed with grazing regime, grazing date, and their interaction (P < 0.1); (c) total production differed with grazing regimes and grazing date (P < 0.1).

 


View larger version (40K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (a) Orchardgrass, (b) Kentucky bluegrass, and (c) quackgrass tiller stage of development averaged across cycles and reported by average grazing date in the spring in a mixed pasture rotationally stocked with cow–calf pairs under tall or short grazing height regimes at State College, PA. Vertical bars indicate 1 SE. Percentage of Kentucky bluegrass flowering tillers differed between regimes (P < 0.1).

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (a) Kentucky bluegrass tiller density, (b) tiller dry weight, and (c) herbage mass at each grazing period in a mixed pasture rotationally stocked with cow–calf pairs under tall or short grazing height regimes at State College, PA. Vertical bars indicate 1 SE. (a) Tiller density differed with grazing regime and grazing date (P < 0.1); (b) tiller dry weight differed with grazing regime, grazing date, and their interaction (P < 0.1); (c) total production differed with grazing regime and grazing date (P < 0.1).

 


View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. (a) Quackgrass tiller density, (b) tiller dry weight, and (c) herbage mass at each grazing period in a mixed pasture rotationally stocked with cow–calf pairs under tall or short grazing height regimes at State College, PA. Vertical bars indicate 1 SE. (a) Tiller density differed with grazing regime (P < 0.1); (b) tiller dry weight differed with grazing date (P < 0.1); (c) total production differed with grazing date (P < 0.1).

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. (a) Dandelion leaf density, (b) leaf dry weight, and (c) herbage mass at each grazing period in a mixed pasture rotationally stocked with cow–calf pairs under tall or short grazing height regimes at State College, PA. Vertical bars indicate 1 SE. (a) Leaf density differed with grazing regime and grazing date (P < 0.1); (b) leaf dry weight differed with grazing date (P < 0.1); (c) total dandelion production differed with grazing date (P < 0.1).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. (a) Total live pasture herbage mass and (b) dead material herbage mass (kg ha-1) at each grazing period in a mixed pasture rotationally stocked with cow–calf pairs under tall or short grazing height regimes at State College, PA. Vertical bars indicate 1 SE. Total pasture and dead material production differed with grazing regime, grazing date, and their interaction (P < 0.1).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.