Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouriño, F.
Right arrow Articles by Berzaghi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mouriño, F.
Right arrow Articles by Berzaghi, P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mouriño, F.
Right arrow Articles by Berzaghi, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Grazing Management
Right arrow Clover
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Production Agriculture

Steer Performance on Kura Clover–Grass and Red Clover–Grass Mixed Pastures

Francisco Mouriñoa, Kenneth A. Albrecht*,a, Daniel M. Schaeferb and Paolo Berzaghic

a Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706
b Dep. of Animal Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, 1675 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706
c Dep. of Animal Sci., Univ. of Padova, Padova, Italy



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Trend line of herbage mass at the beginning of each grazing event of kura clover–grass (KC–G) and red clover–grass (RC–G) pastures during 1998, 1999, and 2000.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Gain per hectare (GAIN), carrying capacity (CC), and average daily gain (ADG) from kura clover–grass (KC–G) and red clover–grass (RC–G) pastures per grazing period in 1998. Pairs of bars with {dagger}, *, or ** were different at P < 0.10, 0.05, or 0.01, respectively. Pooled standard error of each mean was 12, 26, and 0.12 for GAIN, CC, and ADG, respectively.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Gain per hectare (GAIN), carrying capacity (CC), and average daily gain (ADG) from kura clover–grass (KC–G) and red clover–grass (RC–G) pastures per grazing period in 1999. Pairs of bars with {dagger}, *, or ** were different at P < 0.10, 0.05, or 0.01, respectively. Pooled standard error of each mean was 9, 46, and 0.06 for GAIN, CC, and ADG, respectively.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Gain per hectare (GAIN), carrying capacity (CC), and average daily gain (ADG) from kura clover–grass (KC–G) and red clover–grass (RC–G) pastures per grazing period in 2000. Pairs of bars with {dagger}, *, or ** were different at P < 0.10, 0.05, or 0.01, respectively. Pooled standard error of each mean was 13, 69, and 0.14 for GAIN, CC, and ADG, respectively.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.