HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Malinowski, D. P. Articles by Ansley, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Malinowski, D. P. Articles by Ansley, R. J. Agricola Articles by Malinowski, D. P. Articles by Ansley, R. J. Related Collections Forage Management Other Forage Crops

Productivity and Survival of Defoliated Wheatgrasses in the Rolling Plains of Texas

^a Texas A&M Univ., Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., P.O. Box 1658, Vernon, TX 76385
^b The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, P.O. Box 2180, Ardmore, OK 73402

View larger version (31K): [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Average monthly temperature and precipitation for Vernon, TX, during 1999–2001.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Cumulative herbage yield in response to defoliation frequency in the first and second growing season in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Cumulative herbage yield of wheatgrass species in the first and second growing season in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (21K): [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Stubble DM as a function of defoliation (A) frequency and (B) intensity in the first and second growing season in Exp. A. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (40K): [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Aboveground biomass in response to defoliation frequency in the first and second growing season in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (22K): [in a new window]   Fig. 6. The proportion of leaf DM in herbage yield as a function of (A) growing season, (B) defoliation frequency, and (C) wheatgrass species in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (20K): [in a new window]   Fig. 7. The proportion of leaf DM in stubble of wheatgrass species in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (16K): [in a new window]   Fig. 8. The proportion of leaf DM in stubble as a function of defoliation frequency and intensity in Exp. A. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (30K): [in a new window]   Fig. 9. The number of live tillers before summer drought in response to defoliation intensity in the first and second growing season in Exp. A. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (34K): [in a new window]   Fig. 10. The number of live tillers before summer drought as a function of defoliation frequency and wheatgrass species in the (A) first and (B) second growing season in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (27K): [in a new window]   Fig. 11. The number of regrowing tillers after summer drought as a function of defoliation frequency and wheatgrass species in (A) Exp. A and (B) Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (24K): [in a new window]   Fig. 12. The number of regrowing tillers after summer drought as a function of defoliation intensity and wheatgrass species in Exp. A in the (A) first and (B) second growing season. Bars indicate 1 SE.

View larger version (17K): [in a new window]   Fig. 13. The number of regrowing tillers in wheatgrass species after summer drought in the first and second growing season in Exp. B. Bars indicate 1 SE.