Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stooksbury, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stooksbury, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Stooksbury, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Crop Models
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis

Evaluating CROPGRO-Soybean Performance for Use in Climate Impact Studies

Gregory J. Carbone*,a, Linda O. Mearnsb, Theodoros Mavromatisc, E. John Sadlerd and David Stooksburye

a Dep. of Geogr., Univ. of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
b Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80303
c Dep. of Agric. and Biol. Eng., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
d USDA-ARS, Coastal Plains Soil, Water, and Plant Res. Cent., 2611 W. Lucas St., Florence, SC 29501
e Dep. of Biol. and Agric. Eng., Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Locations of eight agricultural experiment stations used in analysis.

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Components of mean squared deviation for maturity group V and Forrest cultivar. LCS, lack of correlation weighted by the standard deviations; SDSD, squared difference between standard deviations; SB, squared bias.

 



View larger version (34K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Time series of simulated and observed yield for Forrest cultivar at (a) Crossville, AL, and (b) Marion Junction, AL.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Components of mean squared deviation for maturity group VI. LCS, lack of correlation weighted by the standard deviations; SDSD, squared difference between standard deviations; SB, squared bias.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Time series of simulated and observed yield for maturity group VI at Jeanerette, LA.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Components of mean squared deviation for maturity group VII and Ransom cultivar. LCS, lack of correlation weighted by the standard deviations; SDSD, squared difference between standard deviations; SB, squared bias.

 



View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Time series of simulated and observed yield for (a) maturity group VII at St. Joseph, LA, and (b) Ransom cultivar at Fairhope, AL.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.