Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Streck, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baenziger, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Streck, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baenziger, P. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Streck, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Baenziger, P. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Crop Models
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

A Generalized Vernalization Response Function for Winter Wheat

Nereu Augusto Strecka, Albert Weiss*,a and P. Stephen Baenzigerb

a School of Nat. Resour. Sci., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0728
b Dep. of Agron. and Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68586-0915



View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Responses of the Morgan–Mercer–Flodin function (Eq. [1]) for differing values of the shape coefficient (n) with a = 0 (intercept), b = 1 (asymptote), and X0.5 = 22.5 (half of the maximum response).

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The vernalization responses of the Morgan–Mercer–Flodin function (Eq. [2]) and the three-stage linear functions (linear function) used by Xue (2000), based on Wang and Engel (1998), for two winter wheat cultivars, Arapahoe and Karl 92. Observed data are from a controlled growth chamber experiment and represent the fraction of full vernalization: 0 = unvernalized plants and 1 = fully vernalized plants. VD, effective vernalization days.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The vernalization responses of 12 winter wheat cultivars from 19 trials, and the f(V) predicted by the Morgan–Mercer–Flodin function (Eq. [2]). The sources of the observed data are in Table 1, and each point represents the fraction of full vernalization: 0 = unvernalized plants and 1 = fully vernalized plants. LN is the leaf number of plants at the onset of the vernalization treatment for cultivar Pioneer 2548. • = Pioneer 2548 - LN = 1, {circ} = Pioneer 2548 - LN = 2, {blacksquare} = Pioneer 2548 - LN = 3, {square} = Pioneer 2548 - LN = 4, {diamondsuit} = Pioneer 2548 - LN = 5, {diamond} = Pioneer 2548 - LN = 6, {blacktriangleup} = Arapahoe, {triangleup} = Karl 92, x = Osprey (T = 3°C), * = Osprey (T = 5°C), • = Hume, {circ} = Norstar, {blacksquare} = Augusta, {square} = Bezostaja, {diamondsuit} = Frederick, {diamond} = Cheyenne, {blacktriangleup} = Winalta, {triangleup} = Cappelle (Fowler et al., 1996), x = Cappelle (Brooking, 1996). VD, effective vernalization days.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.