Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Plant Analysis

Nutritive Value of Rhizoma Peanut Growing under Varying Levels of Artificial Shade

Sue Ellen Johnsona, Lynn E. Sollenberger*,b, Ivo F. Andradec and Jerry M. Bennettb

a New England Small Farm Inst., 275 Jackson St., Belchertown, MA 01007
b Box 110300, Agron. Dep., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0300
c Agric. Res. Inst. of Minas Gerais (EPAMIG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Rhizoma peanut leaf crude protein (CP) response to percentage of incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for harvests (H) in 1989 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 254 - 1.12x + 0.013x2, R2 = 0.85, root mean square error (RMSE) = 7.4; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 222 + 0.34x, r2 = 0.40, RMSE = 11.3; Harvest 3 (•): y = 188 + 1.43x - 0.0067x2, R2 = 0.93, RMSE = 4.5] and 1990 [Harvest 1: not significant, mean = 207 g kg-1; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 175 + 0.51x, r2 = 0.52, RMSE = 13.2; Harvest 3 (•): 177 + 0.60x, r2 = 0.90, RMSE = 5.2].

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Rhizoma peanut leaf in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) [Harvest (H) 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 704 + 0.421x, r2 = 0.50, root mean square error (RMSE) = 11.4; Harvest 2: not significant, mean = 678 g kg-1; Harvest 3 (•): y = 667 + 0.28x, r2 = 0.33, RMSE = 10.8] and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) response to percentage of incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for harvests in 1990 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 343 + 0.98x - 0.013x2, R2 = 0.84, RMSE = 9.6; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): 319 + 2.58x - 0.021x2, R2 = 0.66, RMSE = 9.4; Harvest 3: not significant, mean = 387 g kg-1].

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Rhizoma peanut stem crude protein (CP) response to percentage of incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for harvests (H) in 1989 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 155 - 1.15x + 0.0105x2, R2 = 0.68, root mean square error (RMSE) = 6.5; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 127 + 0.158x, r2 = 0.37, RMSE = 5.6; Harvest 3: not significant, mean = 138 g kg-1] and 1990 [Harvest 1: not significant, mean = 106 g kg-1; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 96.1 + 0.259x, r2 = 0.55, RMSE = 6.3; Harvest 3 (•): 101 + 0.128x, r2 = 0.50, RMSE = 3.5].

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Rhizoma peanut stem in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) response to percentage of incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for harvests (H) in 1989 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 603 + 1.48x, r2 = 0.86, root mean square error (RMSE) = 16.1; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 643 + 1.18x, r2 = 0.78, RMSE = 17.3; Harvest 3 (•): y = 672 + 0.98x, r2 = 0.65, RMSE = 19.3] and in 1990 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 618 + 0.71x, r2 = 0.71, RMSE = 12.3; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 538 + 0.89x, r2 = 0.73, RMSE = 14.8; Harvest 3 (•): 519 + 0.913x, r2 = 0.77, RMSE = 13.7].

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Rhizoma peanut stem neutral detergent fiber (NDF) response to percentage of incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for harvests (H) in 1989 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 617 - 0.87x, r2 = 0.72, root mean square error (RMSE) = 14.8; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 546 - 1.17x, r2 = 0.90, RMSE = 10.4; Harvest 3: not significant, mean = 495 g kg-1] and 1990 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 516 - 0.90x, r2 = 0.61, RMSE = 19.6; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 571 - 0.78x, r2 = 0.66, RMSE = 15.2; Harvest 3 (•): 574 - 0.79x, r2 = 0.70, RMSE = 14.0].

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Rhizoma peanut stem lignin response to percentage of incident photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) for harvests (H) in 1989 [Harvest 1 ({blacksquare}): y = 91 + 0.40x - 0.0052x2, R2 = 0.89, root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.9; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 120 - 0.35x, r2 = 0.73, RMSE = 5.8; Harvest 3 (•): y = 120 - 0.24x, r2 = 0.56, RMSE = 5.7] and 1990 [Harvest 1: not significant, mean = 94 g kg-1; Harvest 2 ({blacktriangleup}): y = 124 - 0.319x, r2 = 0.36, RMSE = 13.7; Harvest 3 (•): 142 - 0.161x, r2 = 0.36, RMSE = 5.9].

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.