Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sainju, U. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yaffa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sainju, U. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yaffa, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sainju, U. M.
Right arrow Articles by Yaffa, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Soil Biochemistry
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Other Soil Management

Soil Organic Matter and Tomato Yield following Tillage, Cover Cropping, and Nitrogen Fertilization

Upendra M. Sainju*, Bharat P. Singh and Sidat Yaffa

Agric. Res. Stn., Fort Valley State Univ., 1005 State University Drive, Fort Valley, GA 31030



View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (A) Average monthly temperature and (B) total monthly rainfall from January 1995 to December 1997, and the 41-yr average near the experimental site in Fort Valley, GA, USA.

 


View larger version (37K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Soil potential C mineralization (PCM), averaged across cover crops and N fertilization rates, as affected by tillage and date of sampling at 0- to 7.5- and 7.5- to 20.0-cm depths from September 1995 to August 1997. NT, no-till; CP, chisel plowing; MP, moldboard plowing. The vertical bar is the least significant difference (LSD; P = 0.05) for measuring significant difference between treatments.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Soil potential N mineralization (PNM) as affected by tillage, cover crop, N fertilization rate, and date of sampling at 0- to 7.5- and 7.5- to 20.0-cm depths from September 1995 to August 1997. NT, no-till; CP, chisel plowing; MP, moldboard plowing. Values of a treatment (i.e., tillage) were averaged across two other treatments (i.e., cover crop and N fertilization rate). The vertical bar is the least significant difference (LSD; P = 0.05) for measuring significant difference between treatments.

 


View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Soil inorganic N concentration as affected by tillage, cover crop, N fertilization rate, and date of sampling at 0- to 7.5- and 7.5- to 20.0-cm depths from September 1995 to August 1997. NT, no-till; CP, chisel plowing; MP, moldboard plowing. Values of a treatment (i.e., tillage) were averaged across two other treatments (i.e., cover crop and N fertilization rate). The vertical bar is the least significant difference (LSD; P = 0.05) for measuring significant difference between treatments.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.