Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Belesky, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Turner, K. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Crop Ecology

Bermudagrass–White Clover–Bluegrass Sward Production and Botanical Dynamics

David P. Belesky*, James M. Fedders, Joyce M. Ruckle and Kenneth E. Turner

USDA-ARS, Appalachian Farming Syst. Res. Cent., 1224 Airport Rd., Beaver, WV 25813



View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Mean monthly maximum and minimum air temperatures, monthly precipitation, and 30-yr mean values for each parameter at Beckley, WV (37°45' N, 81°15' W; 850 m above sea level).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Botanical composition of swards as a function of defoliation frequency in 1995 and 1997. Regression equations describing botanical composition in the growing seasons are presented in Table 1. 2WK, clipped at 2-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue; S50, 10-cm canopy clipped to 5-cm residue; T75, 20-cm canopy clipped to a 5-cm residue; 6WK, clipped at 6-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cumulative dry matter (DM) yield as a function of defoliation frequency for 1995 through 1997. Fitted lines are calculated from the Gompertz growth model. Regression parameters for the equations are presented in Table 3. 2WK, clipped at 2-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue; S50, 10-cm canopy clipped to 5-cm residue; T75, 20-cm canopy clipped to a 5-cm residue; 6WK, clipped at 6-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Instantaneous growth rates (IGRs) of swards from 1995 through 1997 derived from the Gompertz growth model of cumulative yield as influenced by defoliation frequency. 2WK, clipped at 2-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue; S50, 10-cm canopy clipped to 5-cm residue; T75, 20-cm canopy clipped to a 5-cm residue; 6WK, clipped at 6-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue.

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Protein concentration in available herbage over the 1995 and 1997 growing season as a function of defoliation frequency. Vertical bars are standard error of the mean. 2WK, clipped at 2-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue; S50, 10-cm canopy clipped to 5-cm residue; T75, 20-cm canopy clipped to a 5-cm residue; 6WK, clipped at 6-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue.

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. In vitro organic matter disappearance (IVOMD) in available herbage from 1995 through 1997 growing season as a function of defoliation frequency. Vertical bars are standard error of the mean. 2WK, clipped at 2-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue; S50, 10-cm canopy clipped to 5-cm residue; T75, 20-cm canopy clipped to a 5-cm residue; 6WK, clipped at 6-wk intervals to a 5-cm residue.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.