Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, C. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Use
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Water Conservation

Feasibility of Four-Year Crop Rotations in the Central High Plains

Alan J. Schlegel*,a, Troy J. Dumlerb and Curtis R. Thompsonb

a Southwest Res.-Ext. Cent., Kansas State Univ., Tribune, KS 67879
b Southwest Area Ext., Kansas State Univ., Garden City, KS 67846



View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Distribution of available soil water (ASW) within the soil profile at winter wheat planting, 1997–2000, Tribune, KS. Capital letter denotes specific crop in the cropping system. WSSF, wheat–sorghum–sorghum–fallow; WWSF, wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow; WW, continuous wheat.

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Distribution of available soil water (ASW) within the soil profile at grain sorghum planting, 1996–1999, Tribune, KS. Capital letter denotes the specific crop in the cropping system. WSSF, wheat–sorghum–sorghum–fallow; WWSF, wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Net returns for various crop rotations with differing lengths of fallow, Tribune, KS. WWSF, wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow; WSSF, wheat–sorghum–sorghum–fallow; WSF, wheat–sorghum–fallow; WW, continuous wheat.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Required recrop wheat yields in a wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow (WWSF) rotation, at several wheat prices, such that returns equal those of wheat–sorghum–fallow (WSF), based on analyses at Tribune, KS.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Required recrop grain sorghum yields in a wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow (WSSF) rotation, at several sorghum prices, such that returns equal those of wheat–sorghum–fallow (WSF), based on analyses at Tribune, KS.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.