Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vargas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, M. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Statistics

Interpreting Treatment x Environment Interaction in Agronomy Trials

Mateo Vargasa, Jose Crossa*,b, Fred van Eeuwijkd, Kenneth D. Sayrec and Matthew P. Reynoldsc

a Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Km 38.5 Carretera México-Texcoco, Chapingo, Mexico and Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico D.F., Mexico
b Biometrics and Statistics Unit, CIMMYT, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico D.F., Mexico
c Wheat Progr., CIMMYT, Apdo. Postal 6-641, 06600 Mexico D.F., Mexico
d Dep. of Plant Sci., Lab. of Plant Breeding, Wageningen Univ., P.O. Box 386, 6700 AJ Wageningen, the Netherlands



View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Biplot of the first and second additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) axes representing 24 cultural practice treatments (1–24) evaluated over 10 yr (1988–1997) and enriched with the following selected environmental covariables: mT, minimum temperature sheltered; mTU, minimum temperature unsheltered; EV, total monthly evaporation; MT, maximum temperature; D, December; J, January; F, February; M, March; and A, April (from Vargas et al., 1999).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Biplot of the first and second partial least squares (PLS) factors representing the Z scores of the 10 yr (1988–1997) and the Y loadings of the 24 practice treatments (1–24) enriched with the Z loadings of 27 environmental variables: EV, total monthly evaporation; PR, total monthly precipitation; SH, sun hours per day; mT, mean minimum temperature sheltered; MT, mean maximum temperature sheltered; mTU, mean minimum temperature unsheltered; D, December; J, January; F, February; M, March; A, April; and N (from Vargas et al., 1999).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.