Effects of Photoperiod on Growth and Development of Soybean Floral Bud in Different Maturity
Lingxiao Zhang*,a,
Ruifang Wangb and
John D. Heskethc
a Delta Res. and Ext. Cent., Mississippi State Univ., P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776
b Dep. of Agron., Beijing Agric. Univ., Beijing, China
c Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 and USDA-ARS, 1201 W. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Effect of planting date on floral bud development in soybean strains differing in maturity. P1P5 indicate planting groups. Vertical dash lines indicate emergence dates. Horizontal dash lines indicate the time of floral bud growing period from emergence to open flowers on 50% of plants in a field plot. Roman numerals represent maturity groups (MGs). The curved dot line shows photoperiod changes during the growing season. Numbers in parentheses represent average photoperiod experienced during floral bud growth.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Growing degree days (GDD) required from emergence (VE) to floral bud initiation (FBI) and floral bud development (FBD) for soybean strains differing in maturity group (MG) and growing under different photoperiods encountered during the growing season at Urbana, IL.
|
|

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Summary of the effect of timing of the photoperiod treatment on floral bud growth in Clark near-isolines L63-3117 (MG-II) and Clark L65-3366 (MG-V). All plants were under 12 h before treatments started on the day floral buds were initiated, or for L65-3366, 8 d after floral bud initiation (FBI).
|
|
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.