Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khiari, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Khiari, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Khiari, L.
Right arrow Articles by Tremblay, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Crop Models
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Statistics

Selecting the High-Yield Subpopulation for Diagnosing Nutrient Imbalance in Crops

Lotfi Khiaria, Léon-Étienne Parent*,a and Nicolas Tremblayb

a Dep. of Soil Sci. and Agri-Food Eng., Laval Univ., Paul-Comtois Building, Sainte-Foy, QC, Canada G1K 7P4
b Hortic. Res. and Dev. Cent., 430 Gouin Blvd., St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada J3B 3E6



View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Theoretical relationship between yield and the cumulative variance ratio function, FCi (VX), for a given row-centered log ratio.

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Equations relating ear yield to the cumulative variance ratio function in S2 for computing yield cutoff between low- and high-yield subpopulations at inflection point.

 


View larger version (17K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. The chi-square cumulative distribution functions with 3 df to obtain theoretical threshold Compositional Nutrient Diagnosis (CND) r2 values in S2 (1.5) for yield cutoff at 67.5% of low-yield subpopulation.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between nutrient imbalance index, r2, and ear yield in S2.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.