Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roth, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsen, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sorghum
Right arrow Allelopathy

Allelopathy of Sorghum on Wheat under Several Tillage Systems

Chad M. Roth, James P. Shroyer and Gary M. Paulsen

Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA



View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Emergence promptness index of seven wheat cultivars after different sorghum and millet residue treatments. LSD (0.05) = 11 among cultivars and 9 among residue treatments during 1997 and 12 among cultivars and 14 among residue treatments during 1998. Within each cultivar, bars with different letters differ significantly among residue treatments at P = 0.05

 


View larger version (65K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Spike densities at maturity of seven wheat cultivars after different sorghum and millet residue treatments. LSD (0.05) = 38 among cultivars and 34 among residue treatments during 1997 and NS among cultivars and 127 among residue treatments during 1998. Within each cultivar, bars with different letters differ significantly among residue treatments at P = 0.05

 


View larger version (54K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Grain yields of seven wheat cultivars after different sorghum and millet residue treatments. LSD = 68 among cultivars and 62 among residue treatments during 1997 and 79 among cultivars and 97 among residue treatments during 1998. Within each cultivar, bars with different letters differ significantly among residue treatments at P = 0.05

 


View larger version (69K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Harvest index of seven wheat cultivars after different sorghum and millet residue treatments. LSD = 0.03 among cultivars and residue treatments during 1997 and 0.04 among cultivars and residue treatments during 1998. Within each cultivar, bars with different letters differ significantly among residue treatments at P = 0.05

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.