Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moyer, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffey, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moyer, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffey, K. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moyer, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Coffey, K. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Intercropping Systems
Right arrow Interseeding
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Other Forage Crops

Forage Quality and Production of Small Grains Interseeded into Bermudagrass Sod or Grown in Monoculture

Joseph L. Moyera and Kenneth P. Coffeyb

a Kansas State Univ., Southeast Agric. Res. Cent., P.O. Box 316, Parsons, KS 67357 USA
b Dep. of Animal Sci., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA



View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Early (<1000 GDD, solid bars), late (>1000 GDD, open bars), and total (solid and open bars combined) forage production in the spring of 1990, 1992, and 1993 for small grain cultivars interseeded into bermudagrass sod. Bars containing or followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Duncan's test. Root mean square errors for early, late, and total production, respectively, were 0.24, 0.39, and 0.51 for 1990; 0.07, 0.29, and 0.33 for 1992; and 0.03, 0.52, and 0.53 for 1993

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Early (<1000 GDD, solid bars), late (>1000 GDD, open bars), and total (solid and open bars combined) forage production in the spring of 1992 and 1993 for small grain cultivars seeded in monoculture. Bars containing or followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Duncan's test. Root mean square errors for early, late, and total production, respectively, were 0.32, 0.35, and 0.39 for 1992 and 0.64, 0.41, and 0.74 for 1993

 


View larger version (35K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Early (<1000 GDD, solid bars), late (>1000 GDD, open bars), and total (solid and open bars combined) digestible dry matter (DDM) production in the spring of 1992 for small grain cultivars (A) interseeded into bermudagrass sod or (B) seeded in monoculture. Bars containing or followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Duncan's test. Root mean square errors for early, late, and total production, respectively, were 35, 149, and 166 for interseed and 251, 249, and 221 for monoculture

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Early (<1000 GDD, solid bars), late (>1000 GDD, open bars), and total (solid and open bars combined) crude protein production in the spring of 1992 and 1993 for small grain cultivars seeded in monoculture. Bars containing or followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Duncan's test. Root mean square errors for early, late, and total production, respectively, were 149, 100, and 186 for 1992 and 155, 71, and 189 for 1993

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.