Published in Agron J 91:984-990 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
Errors Associated with the Use of Soil Survey Data for Estimating Plant-Available Water at a Regional Scale
Marie-Claude Fortina and
David E. Moonb
a Pacific Agric. and Agri-food Res. Ctr. (Agassiz), Agric. Canada Res. Branch, Soil Sci. Dep., Univ. of British Columbia, 139-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
b CDT Technologies, Richmond, British Columbia, Canada

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1 Regression and comparison of measured water-holding capacity and estimated plant-available water (PAW) calculated using measured soil properties as inputs to the procedure from Ritchie (1986) for 70 sites. Plant-available water is expressed as volume fraction
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2 Regression and comparison of measured water-holding capacity and estimated plant-available water (PAW) calculated using measured soil properties as inputs to the procedure from Ritchie et al. (2000) for 70 sites. Plant-available water is expressed as volume fraction. The estimation procedure is bound at 0.146 to avoid illogical results
|
|

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3 Regression and comparison of measured and soil surveyderived particle size fractions for 70 sites
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4 Regression and comparison of total plant-available water calculated using measured inputs and horizon thickness and of total plant-available water calculated using soil surveyderived inputs and horizon thickness. Both calculations were done using the estimation procedure for plant-available water from Ritchie et al. (2000)
|
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Agronomy.