Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 January 2009
Published in Agron J 101:237-242 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0158N
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

Open Access Article
This Article
Free via Open Access
Right arrow OA Abstract
Right arrow OA Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Below, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ruyle, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Below, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ruyle, T. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Below, F. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ruyle, T. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Plant Growth Regulators

Occurrence and Proposed Cause of Hollow Husk in Maize

Fred E. Below*, Kateri A. Duncan, Martin Uribelarrea and Thomas B. Ruyle

University of Illinois, Crop Science Dep., 1201 W. Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. The dates, amounts of precipitation, and daily temperature extremes at the experimental site during the 2007 growing season. The daily high temperature is indicated by a solid line and the low temperature by a dashed line. Bars represent the total precipitation on a given day. The occurrence of the growth stages and when the treatments were applied are shown at the top of the figure.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. (A) Comparison of a normal ear (top) and an ear exhibiting hollow husk (bottom) and (B) husked ears showing the potential differences in the severity of hollow husk symptoms where ovule development is not visible (far left) to varying degrees of ovule formation. Pictures were taken on 21 July 2007 at the R2 growth stage. Scale is indicated to the left, where one bar is equivalent to 1 cm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The effect of plant population and an application of strobilurin fungicide at V11 on the time course of (A and B) silking and (C and D) pollen shed in 2007. Bars indicate standard error and stars indicate significant differences from the untreated control (UTC) at the 5% confidence level. The UTC is represented by black circles, while strobilurin fungicide treated is represented by white circles.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.