Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 January 2009
Published in Agron J 101:201-206 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0398
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reicks, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bly, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reicks, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bly, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reicks, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bly, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Field evaluation techniques
Right arrow Biofuels
Right arrow Crop Genetics

Improving the Fermentation Characteristics of Corn through Agronomic and Processing Practices

Graig Reicks*, Howard J. Woodard and Anthony Bly

Plant Sci. Dep., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007-1096


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Mean grain yield response (pooling all hybrids) to N treatment (% of recommended fertilizer N) at Brookings and Beresford for 2003 and 2004. Grain yield mean for a particular N treatment with a different letter statistically significant from another N treatment within a particular site-year when analyzed by the Student's t test at the alpha = 0.05 probability level. Dotted line at 10,000 kg ha–1 yield represents the yield goal for which N was applied at the 100% N treatment for all site-years.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Mean grain ethanol concentration responses to N treatment (percent of recommended N application) at Brookings and Beresford for 2003 and 2004. Ethanol concentration means for a particular N treatment with a different letter was significantly different from another site-year response for the same N treatment when analyzed by the Student's t test at the alpha = 0.05 probability level.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy.