Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:845-854 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0247
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gilbert, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Montes, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Sugarcane
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Sugarcane Response to Mill Mud, Fertilizer, and Soybean Nutrient Sources on a Sandy Soil

Robert A. Gilberta,*, Dolen R. Morrisb, Curtis R. Rainbolta, James M. McCraya, Raul E. Perdomoc, Barney Eilandc, Gerard Powellc and German Montesc

a Univ. of Florida, EREC, 3200 E. Palm Beach Rd., Belle Glade, FL, 33430
b USDA-ARS, Sugarcane Field Station, 12990 US Hwy. 441, Canal Point, FL 33438
c Florida Crystals Corp., P.O. Box 86, South Bay, FL 33493


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Sugarcane leaf area index (LAI) in the (A) plant cane, (B) first ratoon, and (C) second ratoon crops for five nutrient management treatments.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Cropping system treatment means for (A) stalk weight, (B) cane yield (TCH), and (C) sucrose yield (TSH) in the plant cane crop. Different letters represent significant differences among cropping system means (P < 0.05).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Significant mill mud x fertilizer interaction means for A) stalk weight, B) cane yield (TCH), and C) sucrose yield (TSH) in the plant cane crop.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Mill mud treatment means for (A) stalk weight, (B) cane yield (TCH), and (C) sucrose yield (TSH) in the first ratoon and second ratoon crops. Different letters within a crop represent significant differences between mill mud treatment means (P < 0.05).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Fertilizer treatment means for (A) plant population, (B) cane yield (TCH), and (C) sucrose yield (TSH) in the first ratoon and second ratoon crops. Different letters within a crop represent significant differences between fertilizer treatment means (P < 0.05).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.