Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:801-807 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0264
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmanov, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmanov, T. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Gilmanov, T. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Physiology & Metabolism
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Crop Models

Simulating Gross Primary Productivity of Humid-Temperate Pastures

R. Howard Skinnera,*, Michael S. Corsonb and Tagir G. Gilmanovc

a USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Lab., Bldg. 3702 Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802
b INRA, Agrocampus Rennes, UMR 1069, Sol, Agro- et hydro-systèmes, Spatialisation, F-35000 Rennes, France
c Dep. of Biology and Microbiology, AgH 310, P.O. Box 2207B, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007


Figure 1
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Observed vs. simulated yearly forage yield for a cool-season grass pasture in central Pennsylvania. Yearly totals are the sum of four to five harvests per year.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Observed vs. simulated yearly gross primary productivity (GPP) for a cool-season grass pasture in central Pennsylvania.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Monthly distribution of measured and simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) for a cool-season grass pasture in central Pennsylvania. Data are averaged over 2004 through 2006 and error bars indicated variability among years ( ± 1 SE).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Daily measured (symbols) and simulated (lines) gross primary productivity (GPP) from 1 January through 31 May of each year. Horizontal bars indicate days when snow cover was >2 cm. Arrows indicate dates when the pasture was grazed.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Influence of air temperature on observed and simulated daily gross primary productivity (GPP) during the first 3 mo of the year.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.