Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:711-719 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0188
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleisher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, V. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fleisher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, V. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fleisher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, V. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Potato
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

Interactive Effects of Carbon Dioxide and Water Stress on Potato Canopy Growth and Development

David H. Fleisher*, Dennis J. Timlin and Vangimalla R. Reddy

USDA-ARS Crop Systems and Global Change Lab., 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705. Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the USDA and does not imply the exclusion of other available products


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Total plant length versus days after emergence for potato plants grown at ambient (370 µmol mol–1) and elevated (740 µmol mol–1) [CO2] at six different levels of water stress (expressed as % of control irrigation). Lines are the fit of the Gompertz equation (Table 2). Data points are averages of measured length of five plants (standard deviations shown).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Individual final leaf area [Xf, (A) and (C)] and leaf expansion rates [Rmax, (B) and (D)] versus irrigation amounts for mainstem and apical stem leaves on potato plants grown at 370 and 740 µmol mol–1 [CO2]. Error bars are standard deviations of five plants per observation. Lowercase letters indicate significantly different regression coefficients.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.