Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:628-634 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0266
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berti, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Forcella, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Berti, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Forcella, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Berti, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Forcella, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Other Oil Crops
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Cuphea Nitrogen Uptake and Seed Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization

Marisol T. Bertia,*, Burton L. Johnsonb, Russ W. Geschc and Frank Forcellac

a Facultad de Agronomía, Univ. de Concepción, Chillán, Chile
b Dep. of Plant Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105-5051
c USDA-ARS, North Central Soil Conserv. Res. Lab., 803 Iowa Ave. Morris, MN 56267


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Regression model for mean nitrate content in cuphea tissue (A) at six N fertility treatments averaged across three phenological stages (vegetative, bloom, and harvest) and three environments (Casselton, ND, 2005, and Glyndon,MN 2005 and 2006) (Env) for Exp. 1, and averaged across four N fertility treatments for Morris, MN 2005 and 2006 for Exp. 2 (P ≤ 0.05) (B) at three phenological stages (vegetative, bloom, and harvest) averaged across six N fertility and three environments for Exp. 1, and averaged across four N fertility for Morris 2005 and 2006 in Exp. 2.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Regression model for seed N content as affected by N fertility for Exp. 1 averaged across three phenological stages and three environments.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Regression model for seed yield as affected by N fertility for Exp. 2 averaged across environments.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Regression model for test weight of cuphea seed as affected by N fertility averaged across three environments for Exp. 1.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Regression models for residual soil nitrate concentration at different soil depths as affected by N fertility for Exp. 1, averaged across environments. *P ≤ 0.05.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.