Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:526-536 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2007.0007
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kapoor, V.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kapoor, V.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kapoor, V.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Rice
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Rice Growth, Grain Yield, and Floodwater Nutrient Dynamics as Affected by Nutrient Placement Method and Rate

Vibhu Kapoora, U. Singhb,*, S. K. Patila, H. Magrea, L. K. Shrivastavaa, V. N. Mishraa, R. O. Dasa, V. K. Samadhiyaa, J. Sanabriab and R. Diamondb

a Indira Gandhi Agricultural University (IGAU), Krishak Nagar, P.O. Box 94, Raipur (CG), 492006, India
b International Center for Soil Fertility and Agricultural Development (IFDC), P.O. Box 2040, Muscle Shoals, AL, 35662


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Weather conditions as represented by daily rainfall (mm), maximum and minimum temperature (°C), and sunshine duration (h) during the 2001 and 2002 experimental years.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Dynamics of floodwater NH4+–N as influenced by N rates and application methods–broadcast incorporation of urea vs. deep placement of briquettes–for 2001 and 2002 season.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Dynamics of floodwater P as influenced by deep placement, conventional application of P, and P rates.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Dynamics of floodwater potassium as influenced by deep placement of N–P–K briquettes and broadcast incorporation of N, P, and K.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Rice grain yield response to rates of P application with broadcast incorporation of SSP, urea at 53 kg N ha–1 and 25 kg K ha–1. Bars with same letters for a given year are not significantly different at LSD5%.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Rice grain yield response to N as influenced by P rates and N application method (deep-placed urea-N briquette vs. conventionally applied prilled urea) for 2 yr with a common K rate of 25 kg ha–1.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.