Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:320-327 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0140
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maas, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rajan, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maas, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rajan, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maas, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rajan, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remote Sensing
Right arrow Crop Models

Estimating Ground Cover of Field Crops Using Medium-Resolution Multispectral Satellite Imagery

Stephan J. Maas* and Nithya Rajan

Dep. of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409


Figure 1
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Pixel digital count (DC) values in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral band plotted vs. corresponding DC values in the red spectral band for a portion of a Landsat-5 image of an agricultural region. (A) Actual distribution of DC values; (B) diagrammatic representation of features of the distribution of DC values; (C) features of the distribution of DC values related to estimating the GC of the image pixel represented by point e.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Results of plotting the pixel digital count (DC) values in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral band vs. the corresponding DC values in the red spectral band for the 30 June, 16 July, 1 August, and 18 September Landsat-5 image acquisitions. The location of the bare soil line is indicated for each distribution of points, along with the location of the point representing full vegetation canopy ("FC").

 

Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Values of ground cover (GC) estimated for the 31 agricultural fields in the study using the satellite image data plotted vs. the corresponding ground-based field observations of GC. The solid diagonal line represents the 1:1 line, while the dashed line represents the least-squares linear regression line fit to these points.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Results of plotting the pixel digital count (DC) values in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral band vs. the corresponding DC values in the red spectral band for the (A) 30 June and (B) 18 September Landsat-5 image acquisitions without masking the image data to remove nonagricultural targets such as clouds, cloud shadows, and lakes.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.