Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 11 January 2008
Published in Agron J 100:22-34 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2007.0013
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Production Agriculture

After 10,000 Years of Agriculture, Whither Agronomy?

Fred P. Miller*

School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Trends in U.S. demographics, farm numbers, farm size, and land in farms, 1850–2006. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, 1975; Hoppe, 2001; USDA-NASS, 2006a, 2006b; USDA-ERS, 2007b. Note: Changes in census definition of farms and methodology account for some graph irregularities, e.g., 1974–1975 and 1994–2000. Farm number anomaly in 1935 reflects people returning to farming due to the Great Depression followed by the impact of WWII.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Average U.S. corn yields: 1900–2002. Source: USDA-NASS, 2006a.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. U.S. harvested area of oats and soybean, 1900–2000. Source: USDA-NASS, 2006a.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Conceptual illustration of Biological Condition or Functional Integrity for two ecosystems (A & B) with differing vulnerabilities to perturbation. Source: Modified from Karr (2000) and Loucks (2000). Note: Sustainability and Resiliency thresholds indicate approximate indices below which continued ecosystem perturbation under specific uses is not sustainable and the capacity for resiliency is severely compromised.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Trends in U.S. irrigated agriculture, 1900–2002. Source: USDA-NASS, 2006a.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. A food future without agriculture? The New Yorker Collection, 2005. J.B. Handelsman from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved. Copied with permission.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.