HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pelletier, S. Articles by Allard, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Pelletier, S. Articles by Allard, G. Agricola Articles by Pelletier, S. Articles by Allard, G. Related Collections Forage Management Nutrient Management

Dietary Cation–Anion Difference and Tetany Index of Timothy Forage Fertilized with Liquid Swine Manure

^a Agric. and Agri-Food Canada, Soils and Crops Res. and Dev. Cent., 2560 Hochelaga Blvd., Québec, QC, Canada G1V 2J3
^b Département de phytologie, Faculté des sciences de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Diagrams of the first two principal components (PC) loadings (A, variates) and scores (B, fertilizer treatments) calculated for spring growth. Values are based on the average of two locations, Saint-Lambert-de-Lévis (loam soil) and Saint-David-de-Lévis (sandy loam soil), and 2 yr, 2001 and 2002.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Diagrams of the first two principal components (PC) loadings (A, variates) and scores (B, fertilizer treatments) calculated for summer regrowth. Values are based on the average of two locations, Saint-Lambert-de-Lévis (loam soil) and Saint-David-de-Lévis (sandy loam soil), and 2 yr, 2001 and 2002.