Agronomy Journal
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 100:154-162 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/agrojnl2006.0218
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Machado, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Machado, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Machado, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Tillage

Tillage Effects on Water Use and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat and Green Pea in Rotation

Stephen Machadoa,*, Steve Petriea, Karl Rhinharta and Robert E. Ramigb

a Oregon State Univ., Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box 370, Pendleton, OR 97801
b USDA-ARS Columbia Plateau Conservation Research Center, Pendleton, OR 97801 (retired). Contribution of Oregon State University, Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, PO Box 370, Pendleton, OR 97801


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Maximum tillage (MT), fall plow (FP), spring plow (SP), and minimum tillage (MinT) effects on soil profile water storage distribution (mm 305 mm–1) during (a) winter wheat phase (pea harvest to first spring moisture reading) and (b) green pea phase (wheat harvest to first spring moisture reading) at Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center (CBARC), Pendleton, OR. Means (at each depth zone) with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Maximum tillage (MT), fall plow (FP), spring plow (SP) (FP for wheat), and minimum tillage (MinT) effects on grain yield of winter wheat and green pea in rotation at Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center (CBARC), Pendleton, OR from 1977 to 1982 and 1985. The graphs also show crop-year precipitation (CYppt) (1 September–31 August), winter precipitation (WTppt) (1 September–28 February), and growing season precipitation (GSppt) (1 March–31 August). Means (within each year) with the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Maximum tillage (MT), fall plow (FP), spring plow (SP), and minimum tillage (MinT) effects on grain yield and water use efficiency of (a) winter wheat and (b) green pea in rotation at Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center (CBARC), Pendleton, OR. Data shown are 7-yr means (1977–1982 and 1985).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Grain yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat and green pea in rotation at Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center (CBARC), Pendleton, OR. Data shown are 7-yr means (1977–1982 and 1985).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy.