HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sullivan, D.G. Articles by van Santen, E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sullivan, D.G. Articles by van Santen, E. Agricola Articles by Sullivan, D.G. Articles by van Santen, E. Related Collections Best Management Practices Residue management Tillage

Crop Residues

Spectral Reflectance Properties of Winter Cover Crops in the Southeastern Coastal Plain

^a USDA-ARS Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31794
^b Auburn Univ., Agronomy and Soils Dep., Auburn, AL, 36849
^c USDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics Lab., Auburn, AL 36832

^* Corresponding author (dana.sullivan{at}ars.usda.gov)

Conservation tillage is a commonly adopted best management practice for reducing runoff and erosion, and increasing infiltration. Yet current methodologies in place to monitor conservation tillage adoption are largely inappropriate for regional or national assessments. A major goal of this study was to evaluate the spectral response properties of four alternative winter cover crops using remotely derived crop residue cover indices. Experimental plots were located in east-central Alabama on a coarse-loamy siliceous, subactive, thermic Plinthic Paleudult. The experiment was a randomized complete block design having four replications of each of the following treatments: one fallow conventional tillage treatment and four no-tillage treatments with black oat (Avena strigosa Schreb.), crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.), turnip (Brassica rapa L. subsp.rapa), or rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crops. Remotely sensed data were acquired three times using a 14 d sampling interval beginning near planting and using a handheld multispectral radiometer (485–1650 nm) in 2005 and 2006. Three crop residue cover indices using combinations of middle-infrared and visible spectra were compared and evaluated. Rye, clover, and black oat were spectrally similar, having an overall spectral response ranging from 8 to 45% (440–1650 nm). Increasing soil water content between remotely sensed data acquisitions was evidenced by as much as a 24% decline in middle-infrared reflectance. Despite this variability, a normalized difference ratio of middle-infrared (1650 nm) and blue (445 nm) spectra (Crop Residue Cover Index) provided the most consistent differentiation between tillage systems, varying within 8% of benchmark conditions (low soil water and low canopy cover). Considering the impact that conservation tillage may have on soil and water resources, rapid, watershed scale assessments of conservation tillage adoption may facilitate natural resource inventories, carbon sequestration estimates, and improved agricultural water management regimes.

Abbreviations: CSP, Conservation Security Program • CTIC, Conservation Technology Information Center • CRC1, crop residue cover • EQIP, Environmental Quality Incentives Program • GNDVI, Greenness Normalized Difference Vegetation Index • MIR, middle infrared • NDVI, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index • NIR, near infrared • RS, remote sensing • VIS, visible

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.G. Sullivan, T.C. Strickland, and M.H. Masters Satellite mapping of conservation tillage adoption in the Little River experimental watershed, Georgia Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, May 1, 2008; 63(3): 112 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]