Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 15 October 2007
Published in Agron J 99:1538-1547 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0364
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Archer, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kludze, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Archer, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kludze, H. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Archer, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kludze, H. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Crop Systems

Cropping Systems

Crop Productivity and Economics during the Transition to Alternative Cropping Systems

David W. Archera,*, Abdullah A. Jaradatb, Jane M-F. Johnsonb, Sharon Lachnicht Weyersb, Russ W. Geschb, Frank Forcellab and Hillarius K. Kludzec

a USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Lab., P.O. Box 459, 1701 10th Ave. SW, Mandan ND, 58554
b USDA-ARS, North Central Soil Conservation Research Lab., 803 Iowa Ave., Morris MN 56267
c Univ. of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, 3925 Hwy. 71, Marianna, FL 32446

* Corresponding author (david.archer{at}ars.usda.gov)

Many environmental benefits accrue from reducing tillage and increasing crop diversity; however, economic factors often encourage the continued use of intensive tillage and specialized crop production. This study examined crop yields, input costs, and economic returns during the transition to a range of cropping system alternatives in the northern Corn Belt region, including different system (organic, conventional), tillage (conventional, strip-tillage), rotation (corn–soybean, corn–soybean–wheat/alfalfa–alfalfa) [Zea mays L., Glycine max (L.) Merr., Triticum aestivum L., Medicago sativa L.], and fertility (no fertilizer/manure, fertilizer/manure applied at recommended rates) treatments. Increasing crop diversity and reducing tillage intensity reduced total costs by $24–102 ha–1 within conventional treatments, and $16–107 ha–1 within organic treatments. Yields of corn, soybean, and wheat were more than 15% lower when using organic vs. the highest yielding conventional practices. Treatments receiving fertilizer or manure had wheat yields more than 0.3 Mg ha–1 and alfalfa yields 2.7 Mg ha–1 higher than treatments that did not receive fertilizer or manure. Within conventional systems, no significant differences in the 4-yr net present value of net returns were detected for tillage and rotation alternatives. Net present values for the organic systems without organic price premiums were at least $692 ha–1 lower than for the best conventional systems suggesting a barrier to the adoption of these systems should organic price premiums decline. However, when organic price premiums were included, most organic treatments had net present values comparable to or exceeding those from conventional treatments.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.