HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McCarty, L. B. Articles by Toler, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McCarty, L. B. Articles by Toler, J. E. Agricola Articles by McCarty, L. B. Articles by Toler, J. E. Related Collections Best Management Practices Turfgrass Management Turfgrass Soil Organic Matter

Turfgrass

Thatch and Mat Management in an Established Creeping Bentgrass Golf Green

^a Dep. of Horticulture, E-143 Poole Ag. Center, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0319
^b Dep. of Applied Economics and Statistics, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634-0319

^* Corresponding author (bmccrty{at}clemson.edu)

Thatch is a layer of partially decomposed organic matter between green shoot tissue and the soil surface, and mat is thatch partially intermixed with topsoil. Excessive thatch–mat layering (>2.54 cm) is generally detrimental to turfgrass management, and numerous techniques including various mechanical and topdressing regimes, have been attempted to reduce its severity. This factorial experiment investigated the effectiveness of combining mechanical–biological and topdressing treatments for controlling thatch–mat levels in an established USGA-specified golf green planted with ‘A-1’ creeping bentgrass [Agrostis stoloniferous L. var. palustris (Huds.)]. Two levels of topdressing were used, and the mechanical–biological treatments included vertical mowing at two different depths and timings, core cultivation, grooming, a biological granular supplement (Thatch-X), and combinations of core cultivation with grooming and/or vertical mowing. Differences among the mechanical–biological treatments were detected following 2 consecutive yearly applications. Thatch–mat depth (mm) was 12 to 15% greater for Thatch-X and topdressing alone compared with other treatments. Organic matter content (g kg^–1) increased 32% for the untreated and decreased 19% for core cultivation combined with vertical mowing and grooming, whereas all other treatments maintained pre-study levels. Compared with the untreated, surface hardness was reduced 9% for all treatments using core cultivation, while water infiltration rates increased 127 to 168%. Vertical mowing treatments improved water infiltration rates by 40 to 65%. Turfgrass quality was not greatly impacted by the mechanical–biological treatments as ratings ranged from 8.4 to 10.0. However, mower scalping and dry spots contributed to unacceptable or only marginally acceptable turfgrass quality (6.4–7.2) for the untreated by the end of the study. Compared with topdressing alone, ball roll distance was decreased 6% by vertical mowing 7 days after treatment (DAT) and 5 to 8% by core cultivation up to 14 DAT. Sand topdressing alone was insufficient for managing thatch–mat levels in an established creeping bentgrass golf green.

Abbreviations: CIV, Clegg Impact Value • C+G, core cultivation four times annually + grooming twice weekly • C+V, core cultivation four times annually + vertical mowed twice annually • C+G+V, core cultivation four times annually + grooming twice weekly + vertical mowed twice annually • DAT, days after treatment • USGA, United States Golf Association