HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peri, P. L. Articles by Lucas, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Peri, P. L. Articles by Lucas, R. J. Agricola Articles by Peri, P. L. Articles by Lucas, R. J. Related Collections Forage Management Agroforestry

Pasture Management

Morphological, Anatomical, and Physiological Changes of Orchardgrass Leaves Grown under Fluctuating Light Regimes

^a Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral-INTA-CONICET, CC 332 (CP 9400), Río Gallegos, Santa Cruz, Argentina
^b Agric. and Life Sciences Div., Lincoln Univ., P.O. Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand
^c School of Agric. Science, Univ. of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia

^* Corresponding author (pperi{at}correo.inta.gov.ar)

The physiological and anatomical adaptability of pastures growing under trees in silvopastoral systems can alter the efficiency of conversion of energy to dry matter (DM). This study was conducted to determine the effects of different fluctuating light regimes (from 24 to 100% transmissivity) on leaf physiology, morphology, anatomy, and structure of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) in a silvopastoral experiment (New Zealand). Slatted shade structures created a bimodal light regime that represented an existing silvopastoral system. Morphologically, as transmissivity decreased the length of the youngest fully expanded leaf and pseudo-stem height increased by up to 33% and the leaf width declined up to 22%. Physiologically, leaf adaptation to different light regimes was characterized by: (i) the light-saturated rate of net photosynthesis (Pmax) and to less extent the photosynthetic efficiency () in sun conditions was double; (ii) in sunny conditions plants grown under shade were photosynthetically less efficient than plants grown in full sunlight with lower Pmax and values; (iii) when plants were exposed to severe shade, leaves adapted to severe shade condition had the highest Pmax, , and , and saturated at the minimum photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) value. These changes in leaf photosynthesis characteristics under different light regimes were attributed to anatomical changes that caused reductions in stomatal conductance (gs), the mesophyll surface area/leaf surface area ratio (A_mes/A) and maintenance respiration for shade adapted plants. These photosynthetic responses and leaf adaptations to fluctuating light regimes can be included into a canopy photosynthesis model to improve the accuracy of DM predictions in silvopastoral systems.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance • DBH, diameter at breast height • DM, dry matter • ESE, standard error of the estimate • gs, stomatal conductance • H, pseudo-stem height • IRGA, infrared gas analysis system • L, length • LAI, leaf area index • LSD, least significant difference • P_max, net photosynthesis • PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density • R/FR, red to far-red wavelengths • RUE, radiation use efficiency • SEM, standard error of means • SLA, specific leaf area • T, temperature • W, width • _lp, predawn leaf water potential