Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 15 October 2007
Published in Agron J 99:1483-1491 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0335
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furon, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Furon, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Furon, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner-Riddle, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions
Right arrow Evapotranspiration Models

Modeling

Analysis of Scaling-Up Resistances from Leaf to Canopy Using Numerical Simulations

Adriana C. Furon, Jon S. Warland* and Claudia Wagner-Riddle

Department of Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

* Corresponding author (jwarland{at}uoguelph.ca)

A multi-layer model, combining Lagrangian dispersion at the canopy level with Ohm's Law analogy at the leaf level, was used in numerical simulations to assess the leaf-to-canopy scale translation of surface resistances. The model produced unique profiles of fluxes and scalar concentrations that satisfied both the dispersion and leaf models. Environmental factors and canopy architecture were varied, and stomatal conductance was simulated using either a simple relationship with net radiation or the Ball and Berry model to account for feedback mechanisms. Results showed that, when the assumptions of the Penman–Monteith equation were met, scaled-up leaf conductance closely matched the bulk canopy conductance. However, as the scenarios modeled departed from the ideal conditions of Penman–Monteith, the agreement decreased. In particular, correct estimation of the aerodynamic resistance, through correct parameterization of the roughness length for sensible heat, was identified as a key issue.

Abbreviations: B&B, Ball and Berry model • D&M, Denmead and Millar model • ICM, ideal canopy model • P-M, Penman–Monteith equation







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.