HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sarlangue, T. Articles by Purcell, L. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sarlangue, T. Articles by Purcell, L. C. Agricola Articles by Sarlangue, T. Articles by Purcell, L. C. Related Collections Crop Physiology & Metabolism Maize Maize Management

Corn

Why Do Maize Hybrids Respond Differently to Variations in Plant Density?

^a Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and Unidad Integrada Balcarce, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)–Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Ruta Nacional 226 km 73.5, C.C. 276, 7620 Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina
^b AACREA. Bolivar 710, Tandil (7000), Buenos Aires, Argentina
^c Dep. of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Arkansas, 1366 Altheimer Dr., Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA

^* Corresponding author (tsarlangue{at}gmail.com)

Received for publication July 7, 2006. Maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield responds greatly to plant density (D). However, the hybrid–plant density interaction usually found is not well understood. The objective of this work was to analyze responses of different maize hybrids to D considering their biomass plasticity and reproductive partitioning. Responses to D were analyzed during 2 yr in three hybrids with contrasting maturity and plasticity. The relationships between aboveground biomass per plant at maturity (Bp) and D and between grain yield per plant (Yp) and Bp were used to explain hybrid responses to D. Optimum D ranged from 10.3 to 13.7 plants m^–2. The hybrid with the lowest optimum D presented the greatest biomass plasticity and reproductive partitioning. Increasing D produced an increase in biomass production per unit area in all hybrids. Contrarily, a greater harvest index (HI) with increasing D was only observed in the hybrids with the least plasticity. Increments in grain yield with increasing D were, in all cases, more associated with increases in biomass production than with increments in HI. Parameters of the equations Bp – D and Yp – Bp were related to optimum D. To validate these relationships, an independent data set was used. Some of these parameters were associated with biomass plasticity and reproductive partitioning and could be used to explain and estimate the responses to D.

Abbreviations: Bp, aboveground biomass per plant at maturity • D, plant population density • Yp, grain yield per plant

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. R. Boomsma, J. B. Santini, M. Tollenaar, and T. J. Vyn Maize Morphophysiological Responses to Intense Crowding and Low Nitrogen Availability: An Analysis and Review Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1426 - 1452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Clay, D. E. Clay, D. P. Horvath, J. Pullis, C. G. Carlson, S. Hansen, and G. Reicks Corn Response to Competition: Growth Alteration vs. Yield Limiting Factors Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1522 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Liu and M. Tollenaar Response of Yield Heterosis to Increasing Plant Density in Maize Crop Sci., September 1, 2009; 49(5): 1807 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Capristo, R. H. Rizzalli, and F. H. Andrade Ecophysiological Yield Components of Maize Hybrids with Contrasting Maturity Agron. J., June 26, 2007; 99(4): 1111 - 1118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]