HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Deak, A. Articles by Archibald, D. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Deak, A. Articles by Archibald, D. D. Agricola Articles by Deak, A. Articles by Archibald, D. D. Related Collections Forage Management Other Forage Crops

Pasture Management

Production and Nutritive Value of Grazed Simple and Complex Forage Mixtures

^a Crop and Soil Sci. Dep., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
^b USDA-ARS, Pasture System and Watershed Manage. Res. Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802

^* Corresponding author (azd114{at}psu.edu)

Received for publication June 5, 2006. Sustainability of forage production in the Northeast USA is affected by environmental and climatic variability. Complex forage mixtures may be better adapted than simple mixtures to variable environments and produce greater dry matter (DM) yield more evenly throughout the growing season, thereby increasing sustainability of forage production. A grazing trial was set up to evaluate forage production, nutritive value, and botanical composition dynamics of well-adapted and commonly sown forage species. The forage treatments consisted of simple mixtures (two and three species) and complex mixtures (six and nine species). The experiment was mob-grazed with cow–calf (Bos taurus L.) pairs five times each year. Dry matter distribution during the growing season was independent of mixture complexity; it was, instead, influenced mainly by the weather. When averaged across all 3 yr, mixtures containing six species produced greater (P < 0.001) forage yield (9900 kg DM ha^–1) compared with two-species (8700 kg DM ha^–1) or three-species mixtures (8400 kg DM ha^–1). However, forage production varied within species richness groups. In general, regardless of the initial botanical composition, the predominant species in most mixtures by the end of the experiment were orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), and white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Variation in nutritive value among mixtures was explained mainly by variation in the proportions of grasses and legumes. We conclude that when it comes to large yields and top nutritive value, the most important consideration is the individual species, not the complexity of the mixtures.

Abbreviations: CP, crude protein • DM, dry matter • IVTDMD, in vitro true dry matter digestibility • NDF, neutral detergent fiber

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Deak, M. H. Hall, and M. A. Sanderson Grazing Schedule Effect on Forage Production and Nutritive Value of Diverse Forage Mixtures Agron. J., March 4, 2009; 101(2): 408 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]