HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Rosenthal, W. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Rosenthal, W. D. Agricola Articles by Baumhardt, R. L. Articles by Rosenthal, W. D. Related Collections Sorghum Irrigation

Sorghum

Sorghum Management Practices Suited to Varying Irrigation Strategies

A Simulation Analysis

^a USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Res. Lab., P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012-0010
^b Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Blackland Res. Ctr., 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502

^* Corresponding author (rlbaumhardt{at}cprl.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication March 28, 2006. Increasing pumping costs and declining well capacities in regions like the Southern High Plains of Texas are requiring producers to adapt cropping practices for use with irrigation levels that vary between complete replacement of crop evapotranspiration (ET) to none (i.e., dryland production). Grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a crop suited to both dryland and various deficit irrigation production systems. Our objectives were to (i) identify cultural practices (planting date, population, and cultivar maturity) that maximize sorghum grain yield for widely varying irrigation strategies; and (ii) consider effective means to allocate available water among irrigation strategies that maximizes the ratio of yield to ET, that is, water use efficiency (WUE). Using the model SORKAM and long-term (1958–1999) weather records from Bushland, TX, we simulated sorghum grain yields on a Pullman soil (fine, mixed, superactive, thermic Torrertic Paleustoll) under dryland (rain) and three deficit irrigation levels (rain + irrigation = 2.5, 3.75, or 5.0 mm d^–1) for all combinations of planting date (mid-May, 15 May; early June, 5 June; and late June, 25 June), cultivar maturity (early, 95 d; medium, 105 d; late, 120 d), and plant density (12 and 16 plants m^–2). For 2.5 mm d^–1 irrigation level, simulated grain yields were maximized with either early or medium-maturing cultivars planted in early June. In contrast, simulated sorghum yield and WUE increased with a mid-May planting date and later-maturing cultivars for irrigation levels of 3.75 and 5.0 mm d^–1. We conclude that spreading water to uniformly irrigate a field with 2.5 mm d^–1 produces 16% less grain than concentrating the same water resources to variably irrigate a field at 3.75 or 5.0 mm d^–1 with complementary (2:1 and 1:1) dryland areas.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • I-WUE, irrigated water use efficiency (kg m^–3) • WUE, water use efficiency (kg m^–3)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Baumhardt, S. A. Staggenborg, P. H. Gowda, P. D. Colaizzi, and T. A. Howell Modeling Irrigation Management Strategies to Maximize Cotton Lint Yield and Water Use Efficiency Agron. J., April 3, 2009; 101(3): 460 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]