HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Board, J. E. Articles by Baur, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Board, J. E. Articles by Baur, M. E. Agricola Articles by Board, J. E. Articles by Baur, M. E. Related Collections Soybean Remote Sensing Production Agriculture

Soybean

Development of Vegetation Indices for Identifying Insect Infestations in Soybean

^a Dep. of Agronomy and Environmental Management, Rm. 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State Univ. Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
^b Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, 148 Seaton Hall, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
^c Center for Geoinformatics, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
^d Dep. of Entomology, Rm. 402 Life Sciences Bldg., Louisiana State Univ. Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803

^* Corresponding author (jboard{at}agctr.lsu.edu)

Received for publication May 18, 2006. Because of greater efficiency relative to conventional methods, interest has developed for using vegetation indices in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] for identifying areas in a field experiencing injury by defoliating insects. Vegetation indices can indicate leaf area index (LAI) and light interception levels, canopy parameters affected by defoliating insects. Our objectives were to determine the relative accuracy of three vegetation indices for predicting LAI and light interception, and to outline a method for using vegetation indices for identifying areas in a field experiencing insect injury. Several commercial soybean cultivars were planted on a Commerce silt loam soil (fine-silty, mixed, nonacid, thermic Aeric Fluvaquent) near Baton Rouge, LA (USA) (30° N lat) in May 2004 and June 2005. In 2004, differences in LAI and light interception were created by manual defoliation, whereas in 2005, LAI/light interception differences occurred because of cultivars and planting dates. Results indicated that across canopies ranging from very low LAI to canopy closure (95% light interception), the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) most accurately predicted LAI and light interception (r² = 0.93–0.97). Light interception and LAI were linked to NDVI by strong linear regression models, and did not show the quadratic response reported by others. A proposed method for adopting NDVI to identify insect-infested areas is presented.

Abbreviations: GNDVI, green normalized difference vegetation index • LAI, leaf area index • NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index • NIR, near infrared • SR, simple ratio