Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:556-561 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0256
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Cotton

Soil & Crop Management

Cotton Seedling Abrasion and Recovery from Wind Blown Sand

Jeffrey T. Baker*

USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research Lab., 302 West I-20, Big Spring, TX 79720

* Corresponding author (jtbaker{at}lbk.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication September 8, 2006. Millions of hectares of crops are exposed to wind blown sand abrasion each year, and in many instances the damage is thought to be severe enough to require replanting. The goal of this study was to determine the effects of wind blown sand abrasion duration on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. Seedlings of three cotton cultivars were exposed to wind velocities of 13.4 m s–1 with sand abrasive flux density of 0.42 g cm–1 width s–1 for six treatment durations ranging from 0 to 40 min. Plants were destructively sampled at the time of the sand abrasion treatment and also at {approx}2 and 4 wk after exposure. These three sampling dates provided two time intervals for assessing the amount of plant damage and regrowth using classical growth analysis. With increasing sand abrasion treatment time, leaf area and leaf, stem, and total shoot biomass were all reduced while final number of mainstem nodes increased (P ≤ 0.05). Cultivar differences in leaf mass were significant only at the second destructive sampling date (P ≤ 0.05). For the first harvest interval, between the first and second destructive sampling, shoot relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR) decreased with increasing sand abrasion treatment time. Regrowth during the second harvest interval revealed the opposite pattern, with RGR and NAR both increasing with increasing sand abrasion treatment time. In both harvest intervals, variation in RGR depended mainly on NAR rather than leaf area ratio (LAR). These results indicate that, despite near-complete defoliation at the longest treatment duration of 40 min, cotton plants receiving this level of damage in the field may not require replanting.

Abbreviations: LAR, leaf area ratio • NAR, net assimilation rate • RGR, relative growth rate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. T. Baker, B. McMichael, J. J. Burke, D. C. Gitz, R. J. Lascano, and J. E. Ephrath
Sand Abrasion Injury and Biomass Partitioning in Cotton Seedlings
Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1297 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.