HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, J. W. Articles by Jones, P. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by White, J. W. Articles by Jones, P. G. Agricola Articles by White, J. W. Articles by Jones, P. G. Related Collections Statistics Soybean Crop Models

Modeling

Regression-Based Evaluation of Ecophysiological Models

^a USDA-ARS, Arid Land Agricultural Research Center, 21881 N Cardon Ln., Maricopa, AZ 85239
^b Agronomy Dep., P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
^c Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Univ. of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223-1797
^d CIAT, Apartado Aéreo 6713, Cali, Colombia

^* Corresponding author (jwhite{at}uswcl.ars.ag.gov)

Received for publication April 3, 2006. Ecophysiological models are increasingly used as research and decision support tools in agriculture, but it is often difficult to assess how suitable a model is for a particular application. Model evaluations usually involve bivariate linear regression between observed and simulated values, which assumes statistical independence among observed values. However, observed data often have dependencies if they originate from series of experiments or involve experiments using nested designs (e.g., with split plots). By representing experiments, cultivars, or other variables as factors, linear regression models can specify expected dependencies, permitting analyses that are statistically more rigorous and provide more insights into model performance. This study evaluated the Cropping System Model (CSM)-CROPGRO-Soybean model using regressions that included environment and cultivars as factors as well as continuous variables such as temperature or daylength. When applied to 28 data sets for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], representing 113 treatment combinations, the regressions showed that the model simulated days to anthesis and grain yield well for a wide range of environments. Differences among environments represented a larger portion of unexplained variation than did differences among cultivars. Further improvements thus might be sought in modeling crop response to environment rather than in representing cultivar differences, or alternatively, in characterizing soil profiles or daily weather rather than cultivars. A submodel for photosynthesis that scaled leaf-level values to canopy simulated grain yield more accurately than a simpler submodel. Multiple regressions provided much more information on model performance than simple bivariate comparisons.

Abbreviations: CSM, Cropping System Model • DF, degrees of freedom • DSSAT, Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer • NS, not significant

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. W. White, M. Herndl, L. A. Hunt, T. S. Payne, and G. Hoogenboom Simulation-Based Analysis of Effects of Vrn and Ppd Loci on Flowering in Wheat Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 678 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]