HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Derby, N. E. Articles by Franzen, D. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Derby, N. E. Articles by Franzen, D. W. Agricola Articles by Derby, N. E. Articles by Franzen, D. W. Related Collections Nitrogen Nutrient Management Site-Specific Analysis

Site-Specific Analysis & Management

Comparison of Nitrogen Management Zone Delineation Methods for Corn Grain Yield

Dep. of Soil Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105-5638

^* Corresponding author (nathan.derby{at}ndsu.edu)

Received for publication January 31, 2006. It is important for today's farmer to manage his fields efficiently to maximize economic return and minimize environmental impacts. Managing agricultural inputs based on spatial variability in a field may help to achieve these goals. The objective of this study was to develop and compare different N management zone delineation methods and investigate the effect that variable N fertilization directed by these zones had on corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield over 4 yr. The zone delineation methods were based on: (i) supervised classification of bare soil color; (ii) cluster analysis of soil N, apparent electrical conductivity (EC_a), and 1 yr of yield data; or (iii) a summation of standardized EC_a, elevation, and 5 yr of yield data. The different delineation methods resulted in relatively similar zone patterns. Applied N rates were mostly affected by varying yield goals due to low variability of soil test N between zones. The effect of zone method on yield was inconsistent over the study period, with the soil color zone yields corresponding best to hypothesized productivity potential. The uniform treatment yields were not significantly different than yields from most of the N management zones. Increases in applied N for management zone treatments resulted in small yet not statistically significant yield increases in most years, with economic benefits over the uniform treatment observed in 2 yr. Yield was affected by adverse weather conditions in 2 yr, resulting in significant increases in subsurface soil N and reduced economic benefits of zone management versus conventional management.

Abbreviations: DGPS, differentially corrected global positioning system • EC_a, apparent electrical conductivity • GDD, growing degree days • GIS, geographical information system • RCB, randomized complete block • U, uniform zone delineation method • V1, variable rate 1 zone delineation method • V2, variable rate 2 zone delineation method