Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 99:325-334 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0139
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Russelle, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Russelle, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Russelle, M. P.
Right arrow Articles by Franzluebbers, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Agricultural Systems
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Symposium Papers

Reconsidering Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems in North America

Michael P. Russellea,*, Martin H. Entzb and Alan J. Franzluebbersc

a USDA-ARS Plant Sci. Res. Unit and U.S. Dairy Forage Res. Center (Minnesota Cluster), 1991 Upper Buford Cir., Room 439, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
b Dep. of Plant Sci., Univ. of Manitoba, 222 Agriculture Bldg., Winnipeg, MB Canada R3T 2N2
c USDA-ARS J. Phil Campbell, Sr., Nat. Res. Conserv. Center, 1420 Experiment Station Rd., Watkinsville, GA 30677-2373

* Corresponding author (russelle{at}umn.edu)

Received for publication May 3, 2006. Although integrated crop–livestock systems have been employed globally for millennia, in the past century, farmers in North America have tended toward increased specialization. There is renewed interest in reintegrating crops and livestock because of concerns about natural resource degradation, the profitability and stability of farm income, long-term sustainability, and increasing regulation of concentrated animal feeding operations. Integrated crop–livestock systems could foster diverse cropping systems, including the use of perennial and legume forages, which could be grown in selected areas of the landscape to achieve multiple environmental benefits. Integrated systems inherently would utilize animal manure, which enhances soil tilth, fertility, and C sequestration. Integration of crops and livestock could occur within a farm or among farms. Both scales of integration rely on farmers' knowledge, motivation, and resources. Despite the numerous benefits that could accrue if farms moved toward on-farm or among-farm integration of crops and livestock, the complexity of such systems could constrain adoption. However, farmers should expect that adoption of integrated crop–livestock systems would enhance both profitability and environmental sustainability of their farms and communities. The combination of system complexity and potential for public benefit justify the establishment of a new national or international research initiative to overcome constraints and move North American agriculture toward greater profitability and sustainability.

Abbreviations: DM, dry matter • LTER, long term ecological research




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. W. Maughan, J. P. C. Flores, I. Anghinoni, G. Bollero, F. G. Fernandez, and B. F. Tracy
Soil Quality and Corn Yield under Crop-Livestock Integration in Illinois
Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1503 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
T. W. Katsvairo, D. L. Wright, J. J. Marois, J. R. Rich, and P. P. Wiatrak
Comparative Plant Growth and Development in two Cotton Rotations under Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Conditions
Crop Sci., October 22, 2009; 49(6): 2233 - 2245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
B. F. Tracy and A. S. Davis
Weed Biomass and Species Composition as Affected by an Integrated Crop-Livestock System
Crop Sci., June 26, 2009; 49(4): 1523 - 1530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. L. Baumhardt, R. C. Schwartz, L. W. Greene, and J. C. MacDonald
Cattle Gain and Crop Yield for a Dryland Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Rotation
Agron. J., January 8, 2009; 101(1): 150 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. W. Katsvairo, D. L. Wright, J. J. Marois, D. L. Hartzog, K. B. Balkcom, P. P. Wiatrak, and J. R. Rich
Performance of Peanut and Cotton in a Bahiagrass Cropping System
Agron. J., August 10, 2007; 99(5): 1245 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. P. Russelle and A. J. Franzluebbers
Introduction to "Symposium: Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems for Profit and Sustainability"
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 323 - 324.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. M. Sulc and B. F. Tracy
Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the U.S. Corn Belt
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 335 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.