HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eichinger, W. E. Articles by Cooper, D. I. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Eichinger, W. E. Articles by Cooper, D. I. Agricola Articles by Eichinger, W. E. Articles by Cooper, D. I. Related Collections Evapotranspiration Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions Evapotranspiration Models Agroclimatology Remote Sensing

Special Submissions

Using Lidar Remote Sensing for Spatially Resolved Measurements of Evaporation and Other Meteorological Parameters

^a Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
^b Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545

^* Corresponding author (william-eichinger{at}uiowa.edu)

Received for publication April 18, 2005. Remote sensors are useful tools for making measurements that are not possible with conventional point instruments. We developed methods to obtain spatially resolved latent energy fluxes from Raman water vapor data and the regional virtual potential heat flux from elastic lidar data. The evaporation method is based on Monin–Obukhov similarity theory applied to spatially and temporally averaged data. Latent heat flux estimates were found to be well correlated (R² = 0.84, slope = 0.98) compared with eddy correlation measurements. The standard error of the flux estimates was 36.5 W m^–2 (a 14% root mean square [RMS] difference), which is close to the predicted uncertainty of 15%. A vertically staring elastic lidar was used to obtain a continuous record of the boundary layer height and thickness of the entrainment zone between a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and a corn (Zea mays L.) field. The surface heat flux was calculated using the Batchvarova–Gryning boundary layer model. The virtual potential heat flux estimates were found to be well correlated (R² = 0.79, slope = 0.95) compared with eddy correlation measurements. The standard error of the flux estimates was 21.4 Wm^–2 (31% RMS difference between estimates and surface measurements), higher than the predicted uncertainty of 16%. Other parameters such as the Monin–Obukhov length, the stability correction functions, and integral scale can be obtained from lidar data.

Abbreviations: LANL, Los Alamos National Laboratory

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Steiner and J. L. Hatfield Winds of Change: A Century of Agroclimate Research Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-132 - S-152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]