|
|
||||||||
a USDA-ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., Bldg. 007, BARC West, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705
b Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
* Corresponding author (manderson{at}hydrolab.arsusda.gov)
Received for publication April 1, 2005. A number of recent intensive and extended field campaigns have been devoted to the collection of land-surface fluxes from a variety of platforms, with the purpose of inferring the long-term C, water, and energy budgets across large areas (watershed, continental, or global scales). One approach to flux upscaling is to use landatmosphere transfer schemes (LATS) linked to remotely sensed boundary conditions as an intermediary between the sensor footprint and regional scales. In this capacity, we examined the utility of a multiscale LATS framework that uses thermal, visible and near infrared remote sensing imagery from multiple satellites to partition surface temperature and fluxes between the soil and canopy. We conducted exercises using tower and aircraft flux data collected at three experiment sites in Oklahoma and Iowa, each with a different configuration of instrumentation. Combined, the two flux-monitoring systems were found to be complementary: the towers provided high-spatial-resolution, time-continuous validation at discrete points within the modeling domain, while with the aircraft data it could be confirmed that the model was reproducing broad spatial patterns observed at specific moments in time. High-resolution flux maps created with the LATS allowed evaluation of differences in footprint associated with turbulent, radiative, and conductive flux sensors, which may be contributing to energy budget closure problems observed with eddy correlation systems. The ability to map fluxes at multiple resolutions (1 m10 km) with a common model framework is beneficial in providing spatial context to an experiment by bracketing the scale of interest. Multiscale flux maps can also assist in the experimental design stage, in a priori assessments of sensor representativeness in complex landscapes.
Abbreviations: ABL, atmospheric boundary layer agl, above ground level ALEXI, AtmosphereLand Exchange Inverse ASTER, Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission Reflectance Radiometer EC, eddy correlation ER, El Reno, OK ET, evapotranspiration GOES, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite LAI, leaf area index Landsat, Land Remote-Sensing Satellite LATS, landatmosphere transfer scheme OASIS, Oklahoma Atmospheric Surface-Layer Instrumentation System RMSD, root mean square difference SMACEX, Soil MoistureAtmospheric Coupling Experiment SPG97, Southern Great Plains Experiment of 1997 TIMS, Thermal Infrared Multispectral Scanner TSEB, two-source surface energy balance vis/NIR, visible and near infrared
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Hatfield, A. A. Gitelson, J. S. Schepers, and C. L. Walthall Application of Spectral Remote Sensing for Agronomic Decisions Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-117 - S-131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Steiner and J. L. Hatfield Winds of Change: A Century of Agroclimate Research Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-132 - S-152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||