Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 2007
Published in Agron J 99:240-254 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0096S
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evapotranspiration
Right arrow Upscaling
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Remote Sensing

Special Submissions

Upscaling Flux Observations from Local to Continental Scales Using Thermal Remote Sensing

Martha C. Andersona,*, William P. Kustasa and John M. Normanb

a USDA-ARS, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Lab., Bldg. 007, BARC West, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705
b Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

* Corresponding author (manderson{at}hydrolab.arsusda.gov)

Received for publication April 1, 2005. A number of recent intensive and extended field campaigns have been devoted to the collection of land-surface fluxes from a variety of platforms, with the purpose of inferring the long-term C, water, and energy budgets across large areas (watershed, continental, or global scales). One approach to flux upscaling is to use land–atmosphere transfer schemes (LATS) linked to remotely sensed boundary conditions as an intermediary between the sensor footprint and regional scales. In this capacity, we examined the utility of a multiscale LATS framework that uses thermal, visible and near infrared remote sensing imagery from multiple satellites to partition surface temperature and fluxes between the soil and canopy. We conducted exercises using tower and aircraft flux data collected at three experiment sites in Oklahoma and Iowa, each with a different configuration of instrumentation. Combined, the two flux-monitoring systems were found to be complementary: the towers provided high-spatial-resolution, time-continuous validation at discrete points within the modeling domain, while with the aircraft data it could be confirmed that the model was reproducing broad spatial patterns observed at specific moments in time. High-resolution flux maps created with the LATS allowed evaluation of differences in footprint associated with turbulent, radiative, and conductive flux sensors, which may be contributing to energy budget closure problems observed with eddy correlation systems. The ability to map fluxes at multiple resolutions (1 m–10 km) with a common model framework is beneficial in providing spatial context to an experiment by bracketing the scale of interest. Multiscale flux maps can also assist in the experimental design stage, in a priori assessments of sensor representativeness in complex landscapes.

Abbreviations: ABL, atmospheric boundary layer • agl, above ground level • ALEXI, Atmosphere–Land Exchange Inverse • ASTER, Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission Reflectance Radiometer • EC, eddy correlation • ER, El Reno, OK • ET, evapotranspiration • GOES, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite • LAI, leaf area index • Landsat, Land Remote-Sensing Satellite • LATS, land–atmosphere transfer scheme • OASIS, Oklahoma Atmospheric Surface-Layer Instrumentation System • RMSD, root mean square difference • SMACEX, Soil Moisture–Atmospheric Coupling Experiment • SPG97, Southern Great Plains Experiment of 1997 • TIMS, Thermal Infrared Multispectral Scanner • TSEB, two-source surface energy balance • vis/NIR, visible and near infrared




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Hatfield, A. A. Gitelson, J. S. Schepers, and C. L. Walthall
Application of Spectral Remote Sensing for Agronomic Decisions
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-117 - S-131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Steiner and J. L. Hatfield
Winds of Change: A Century of Agroclimate Research
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(Supplement_3): S-132 - S-152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.