Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 January 2007
Published in Agron J 99:184-194 (2007)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0016
© 2007 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tewolde, H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tewolde, H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tewolde, H.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Waste Management

Lint Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton Fertilized with Broiler Litter

H. Tewoldea,*, K. R. Sistanib, D. E. Rowea, A. Adelia and J. R. Johnsonc

a USDA-ARS, Mississippi State, MS 39762
b USDA-ARS, Bowling Green, KY 42101
c Mississippi State Univ., Holly Springs, MS 38635

* Corresponding author (htewolde{at}msa-msstate.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication January 21, 2006. Poultry litter is generated in large quantities in the same southeastern U.S. states where cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a dominant field crop, but is rarely used as a primary cotton fertilizer partly because of lack of adequate management recommendations. This research was conducted to determine adequate rates of broiler litter and whether supplementation with inorganic N would be necessary for optimum cotton lint yield and fiber quality. The research was conducted from 2002 to 2004 on two commercial farms representing conventional-till (CT) and no-till (NT) systems. The treatments consisted of an unfertilized control, a farm standard (STD) fertilized with inorganic fertilizers, and broiler litter of 2.2, 4.5, and 6.7 Mg ha–1 in an incomplete factorial combination with 0, 34, or 67 kg ha–1 N as urea–ammonium nitrate solution (UAN). Litter without supplemental UAN–N increased yield by 23 to 110 kg lint ha–1 for every 1.0 Mg ha–1 litter under both CT and NT. The often-recommended litter rate of 4.5 Mg ha–1 was not adequate to increase yield to be equivalent to that of the STD that received 101 to 135 kg ha–1 as UAN. It was necessary to supplement this or the other litter rates with 34 or 67 kg ha–1 UAN–N to support yield equal to or greater than the yield of the STD. The most consistently well-performing treatment under both tillage systems in all years was the 4.5 Mg ha–1 litter supplemented with 67 kg ha–1 UAN–N. Lint yield was highly correlated (r2 = 0.83–0.97) with applied total plant-available N (NTPA) under both systems. Fiber quality, fiber length and micronaire in particular, also responded to NTPA, but the responses were smaller than lint yield. Litter when adequately supplemented with UAN–N did not adversely affect fiber quality. These results show broiler litter as much as 4.5 Mg ha–1 should be supplemented with inorganic N fertilizers when used as a primary cotton fertilizer and when the expected yield is {approx}1700 kg ha–1 under CT and {approx}1500 kg ha–1 under NT.

Abbreviations: +b, yellowness index • CT, conventional-till • L0N0, L2.2N0, L2.2N34, L2.2N67, L4.5N0, L4.5N34, L4.5N67, L6.7N0, L6.7N34, L = litter, N = N as urea–ammonium nitrate and a subscript represents applied litter (Mg ha–1) or N (kg ha–1) • LL, linear effect of litter • NL, linear effect of N as urea–ammonium nitrate • NT, no-till; NTPA, applied total plant-available N • Rd, reflectance • STD, farm standard fertilization • UAN, urea–ammonium nitrate solution • UAN–N, UAN–nitrogen • UR, length uniformity ratio




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. Tewolde, M. W. Shankle, K. R. Sistani, A. Adeli, and D. E. Rowe
No-Till and Conventional-Till Cotton Response to Broiler Litter Fertilization in an Upland Soil: Lint Yield
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 502 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Adeli, M. W. Shankle, H. Tewolde, K. R. Sistani, and D. E. Rowe
Nutrient Dynamics from Broiler Litter Applied to No-Till Cotton in an Upland Soil
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 564 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. Tewolde, K. R. Sistani, D. E. Rowe, and A. Adeli
Phosphorus Extraction by Cotton Fertilized with Broiler Litter
Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 999 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
H. Tewolde, K. R. Sistani, D. E. Rowe, A. Adeli, and D. L. Boykin
Nitrogen Extraction by Cotton Fertilized with Broiler Litter
Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 1131 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy.