Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 98:1634-1639 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0083
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siebert, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Siebert, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Siebert, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Stewart, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Production Agriculture

Production Papers

Influence of Plant Density on Cotton Response to Mepiquat Chloride Application

Jonathan D. Sieberta,* and Alexander M. Stewartb

a Monsanto Co., Leland Agronomy Center, 4006 Old Leland Rd., Leland, MS 38756
b LSU AgCenter, Dean Lee Research Station, 8105 Tom Bowman Dr., Alexandria, LA 71302

* Corresponding author (jonathan.d.siebert{at}monsanto.com)

Received for publication March 21, 2006. Increased yield potential associated with full-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) varieties can be offset by excessive vegetative growth that leads to undesirable fruit shed and boll rot. Producers often make multiple mepiquat chloride (1,1-dimethyl-piperidinium chloride) applications with excessive seasonal use rates to combat this problem, often with inconsistent results. Field studies were conducted in 2004 and 2005 to evaluate reduced plant populations as a potential management tool to be used in conjunction with mepiquat chloride application strategies for managing plant height. Plant populations of 152883, 101929, and 50958 plants ha–1 received a single application at 12 nodes (15.2 g a.i. ha–1) or early bloom (45.8 g a.i. ha–1), sequential applications at 12 nodes (15.2 g a.i. ha–1) and early bloom (30.6 g a.i. ha–1), or the modified early bloom schedule (a plant growth regulator application decision aid that recommends rates and timing based on plant growth parameters). Mepiquat chloride application reduced final plant height at least 15 cm compared with the nontreated in both years but also reduced the number of main stem nodes in 2005. In 2005, lint yield was inversely related to plant population, and a significant yield response occurred with the modified early bloom mepiquat chloride application strategy. Mepiquat chloride application increased lint yield in 1 of 2 yr but was useful for reducing plant height regardless of population. Reducing plant population had no adverse effects on lint yield or fiber properties and may be valuable in achieving a desired plant stature with less intensive plant growth regulator management.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
N. B. O'Berry, J. C. Faircloth, M. A. Jones, D. A. Herbert Jr., A. O. Abaye, T. E. McKemie, and C. Brownie
Differential Responses of Cotton Cultivars when Applying Mepiquat Pentaborate
Agron. J., January 8, 2009; 101(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.