HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miller, P. R. Articles by Holmes, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Miller, P. R. Articles by Holmes, J. A. Agricola Articles by Miller, P. R. Articles by Holmes, J. A. Related Collections Other Legumes Nitrogen Other Forage Crops Crop Systems Water Conservation

Production Papers

Cropping Sequence Effect of Pea and Pea Management on Spring Wheat in the Northern Great Plains

Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 173120, Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717-3120

^* Corresponding author (pmiller{at}montana.edu)

Received for publication November 3, 2005. Annual legumes permit intensified cropping in no-till systems in the drought-prone northern Great Plains. Our objectives were to compare cropping sequence effects of pea (Pisum sativum L.) with fallow, mustard (Sinapis alba L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and to measure the effects of pea harvest timing and shoot biomass presence on soil water use and N contribution, and yield and grain quality of subsequent wheat. Pea, mustard, wheat, and fallow preceded spring wheat at three sites in Montana. In the first year, two harvest timings (anthesis and maturity) were included and managed for presence or absence of crop shoot biomass. In the second year, a wheat test crop was grown at four N fertilizer rates. Regardless of management, pea used equal or less soil water, contributed equal or greater soil N, and had equal or greater positive impact on subsequent wheat growth than mustard or wheat. Compared with maturity, midseason harvest timing of pea increased soil N (30–39 kg NO₃–N ha^–1) and soil water (19–39 mm) available in the spring to the subsequent wheat test crop at two of three sites. Under severe drought, midseason harvest of pea increased wheat yield 50% and critically increased grain density compared with the mature pea harvest. At the N-limited site, midseason harvest of pea increased wheat yield 14% and grain protein 9% compared with mature pea harvest. Pea shoot biomass presence did not affect soil water or N, or growth of a subsequent wheat crop.

Abbreviations: DAS, days after seeding • LSD, least significant difference • LTA, long-term average • NIR, near infrared • NUE, nitrogen-use-efficiency • PASW, plant-available soil water

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. P. Dusenbury, R. E. Engel, P. R. Miller, R. L. Lemke, and R. Wallander Nitrous oxide emissions from a Northern Great Plains soil as influenced by nitrogen management and cropping systems. J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 542 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. L. Walley, G. W. Clayton, P. R. Miller, P. M. Carr, and G. P. Lafond Nitrogen Economy of Pulse Crop Production in the Northern Great Plains Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1710 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]