HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Adler, P. R. Articles by Jung, H.-J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Adler, P. R. Articles by Jung, H.-J. G. Agricola Articles by Adler, P. R. Articles by Jung, H.-J. G. Related Collections Forage Management Other Forage Crops Biofuels

Production Papers

Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring

^a USDA-ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802
^b USDA-ARS, Eastern Regional Research Center, Wyndmoor, PA 19038
^c USDA-ARS, U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53706
^d USDA-ARS, Plant Science Research Unit, 411 Borlaug Hall, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108

^* Corresponding author (paul.adler{at}ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication December 22, 2005. Seasonal time of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) harvest affects yield and biofuel quality and balancing these two components may vary depending on conversion system. A field study compared fall and spring harvest measuring biomass yield, element concentration, carbohydrate characterization, and total synthetic gas production as indicators of biofuel quality for direct combustion, ethanol production, and gasification systems for generation of energy. Switchgrass yields decreased almost 40% (from about 7–4.4 Mg ha^–1) in winters with above average snowfall when harvest was delayed over winter until spring. The moisture concentration also decreased (from about 350–70 g kg^–1) only reaching low enough levels for safe storage by spring. About 10% of the yield reduction during winter resulted from decreases in tiller mass; however, almost 90% of the yield reduction was due to an increase in biomass left behind by the baler. Mineral element concentrations generally decreased with the delay in harvest until spring. Energy yield from gasification did not decrease on a unit biomass basis, whereas ethanol production was variable depending on the assessment method. When expressed on a unit area basis, energy yield decreased. Biofuel conversion systems may determine harvest timing. For direct combustion, the reduced mineral concentrations in spring-harvested biomass are desirable. For ethanol fermentation and gasification systems, however, lignocellulose yield may be more important. On conservations lands, the wildlife cover provided by switchgrass over the winter may increase the desirability of spring harvest along with the higher biofuel quality.

Abbreviations: DM, dry matter • GC, gas chromatography • HPLC, high-pressure liquid chromatography • MS, mass spectrometer

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Grassini, E. Hunt, R. B. Mitchell, and A. Weiss Simulating Switchgrass Growth and Development under Potential and Water-Limiting Conditions Agron. J., April 3, 2009; 101(3): 564 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Sanderson Upland Switchgrass Yield, Nutritive Value, and Soil Carbon Changes Under Grazing and Clipping Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 510 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]