Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 October 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1501-1509 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0342
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Whittaker, G. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Whittaker, G. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Whittaker, G. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Other Oil Crops
Right arrow Agricultural Systems

Production Papers

Conservation Practices in Western Oregon Perennial Grass Seed Systems

II. Meadowfoam Rotation Crop Management

J. J. Steiner*, G. W. Mueller-Warrant, S. M. Griffith, G. M. Banowetz and G. W. Whittaker

USDA-ARS, National Forage Seed Production Research Center, 3450 SW Campus Way, Corvallis, OR 97331

* Corresponding author (jeffrey.steiner{at}ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication December 15, 2005. Rapid changes in practices used to produce perennial grass seed crops in the U.S. Pacific Northwest region and shortened lengths of time that perennial grass seed fields remain in production have increased the need for additional rotation crops that are adapted to the poorly drained soils found in western Oregon. This research was conducted at three sites to determine ways to manage meadowfoam (Limnanthes alba Hartw. ex Benth.) as a component in perennial grass seed rotation systems. Experiments were conducted in 1997, 1998, and 2001 to investigate combinations of spring-applied herbicide and N fertilizer and times of applications, direct-seeded and conventional tillage establishment methods, and previous crop residue management on meadowfoam seed yield, seed oil concentration, and oil yield. No spring-applied fertilizer or herbicide produced responses for all yield components as great as or greater than any other treatment combination. Direct-seeded meadowfoam yielded more oil than the conventional establishment treatment. There was no effect of residue management amounts from grass seed grown in the previous rotation sequence on meadowfoam production; however, maximal residue management, especially if used in combination with direct-seeded meadowfoam, should reduce annual soil erosion. Meadowfoam is suited to low-input production and is adapted to the use of conservation practices including direct seeding and maximal residue management in perennial grass seed systems.

Abbreviations: H+F+, herbicide plus fertilizer applied at the normal time • H+F–, herbicide applied at the normal time but without fertilizer • H+Fd, herbicide applied at the normal time with fertilizer application delayed • H–F+, fertilizer applied at the normal time without herbicide • H–F–, no herbicide or fertilizer applied • HdF+, fertilizer applied at the normal time but the herbicide application delayed • HdF–, herbicide application delayed and no fertilizer applied







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.