HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jaynes, D. B. Articles by Colvin, T. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jaynes, D. B. Articles by Colvin, T. S. Agricola Articles by Jaynes, D. B. Articles by Colvin, T. S. Related Collections Water Quality Maize Nitrogen

Production Papers

Corn Yield and Nitrate Loss in Subsurface Drainage from Midseason Nitrogen Fertilizer Application

USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

^* Corresponding author (jaynes{at}nstl.gov)

Received for publication February 13, 2006. Whether in response to remotely sensed plant N status or as a rescue treatment when previously applied N has been lost to denitrification or leaching, there is growing interest in applying N to corn at midseason. While the yield benefits of this practice are variable, little information is available as to the impacts of midseason N application on water quality. We compared grain yields and NO₃ losses in drainage water as a result of applying N either once after emergence or equally split between just after emergence and midseason (V16). Nitrogen treatments consisted of 199 (H), 138 (M), and 69 (L) kg ha^–1 applied postemergence (V1–V3), and 69 kg ha^–1 applied postemergence and again at midseason (R). Grain yield for corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], grown in a 2-yr rotation, and drainage water NO₃ concentrations were measured on replicated tile-drained plots in a producer's field from 2002 through 2005. Midseason application of additional N resulted in 0.9 and 2.5 Mg ha^–1 greater yield than the L treatment in 2002 and 2004, respectively; however, yield was greater when the same total amount of N was applied in one application shortly after emergence (M treatment) vs. the split treatment. There was no carryover effect on subsequent soybean yields for any of the N treatments. Annual flow-weighted NO₃ concentrations in tile drainage were consistently greater (0.3–1.3 mg L^–1) for the R treatment than the M treatment and significantly greater when averaged across all years. Residual soil NO₃ at the end of the year also indicated that some of the midseason N application was not taken up by the crop and was available for leaching. Thus, midseason N application was beneficial for recovering some of the potential yield in corn when initial N applications are insufficient for optimum yield, but the practice did not benefit water quality in this study compared with a single application at emergence.

Abbreviations: MCL, maximum contaminant level • UAN, urea–ammonium nitrate