Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Agron J 98:1442-1452 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0322
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fleisher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, V. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fleisher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, V. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fleisher, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, V. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Potato

Potato

Temperature Influence on Potato Leaf and Branch Distribution and on Canopy Photosynthetic Rate

David H. Fleisher*, Dennis J. Timlin and Vangimalla R. Reddy

USDA-ARS Crop Systems and Global Change Lab., 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705

* Corresponding author (dfleishe{at}asrr.arsusda.gov)

Received for publication December 1, 2006. Mature potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Kennebec) canopies are composed of leaves originating from main- and axillary-stem branches. Canopy leaf distribution and its corresponding contribution to whole-canopy photosynthetic rates have not been quantified. An experiment using SPAR (Soil–Plant–Atmosphere–Research) chambers maintained at 16-h day/night thermoperiods of 14/10, 17/12, 20/15, 23/18, 28/23, and 34/29°C was conducted. Mature canopies were divided into three horizontal layers of equal depth. Canopies were defoliated at each layer, from the ground upward, on successive days. Response curves for photosynthetic rate vs. irradiance were obtained after each defoliation. Leaf area within each layer followed a quadratic relationship with temperature. The largest areas were between 16.6 and 22.1°C. Main-stem leaves accounted for >50% of the total leaf area at temperatures <22°C, while the proportion of axillary-stem leaf area in each layer increased with temperature. Canopy maximum gross photosynthetic rates, AMAX, before harvest ranged from 9.5 to 34.8 µmol CO2 m–2 s–1 (production-area basis) and were higher at 14/10, 17/12, and 20/15°C temperatures than at 23/18, 28/23, and 34/29°C. These values were largely related to the quantity of leaf area in each chamber. The value of AMAX and canopy light use efficiency declined as successive canopy layers were removed, primarily due to decreases in canopy light interception. These results indicate that the relative proportion of main- or axillary-stem leaves are not as important for potato canopy modeling considerations as is the need to simulate the correct quantity of leaf area.

Abbreviations: IPAR, intercepted photosynthetically active radiation • PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • PPF, photosynthetic photon flux • SPAR, Soil–Plant–Atmosphere–Research







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.