Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 3 October 2006
Published in Agron J 98:1400-1409 (2006)
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0293
© 2006 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Karn, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Karn, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Karn, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Frank, A. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Germplasm Enhancement
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Plant Analysis

Forages

Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue

J. F. Karn*, J. D. Berdahl and A. B. Frank

USDA-ARS Northern Great Plains Research Lab., P.O. Box 459, Mandan, ND 58554

* Corresponding author (karnj{at}mandan.ars.usda.gov)

Received for publication October 21, 2005. Improved perennial grasses provide ranchers with high-quality forage for grazing and hay. However, in the Northern Great Plains of the USA, nutritive quality information is limited on both established and new cultivars. This study compares the nutritive quality of established and more recently released cultivars of crested wheatgrass [Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes] (CWG), intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and Dewey] (IWG), western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Love] (WWG), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) (SBG); evaluates the effect of plant maturity on tissue quality; compares nutritive quality differences among species; and evaluates nutritive quality relationships. Smooth bromegrass leaf tissue had the highest (P < 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but IWG and WWG had higher stem IVDMD. Few quality differences were detected between cultivars within a species, but ‘Rosana’ WWG had higher (P < 0.10) stem and whole plant IVDMD than the more recently released ‘Rodan’. Leaf percentage differed significantly (P < 0.05) among species, with WWG (49.8%) having the highest, and CWG (21.2%) the lowest. Correlation coefficients between quality measurements suggest that if grass leaf tissue were selected for higher IVDMD, leaves should also have higher crude protein (CP) and lower NDF. This relationship was best illustrated with WWG for all three tissue types. The apparent lower quality of Rodan WWG compared with the older cultivar, Rosana, should caution plant breeders to monitor forage quality to ensure that selection for improved agronomic traits does not compromise nutritive quality.

Abbreviations: CP, crude protein • CWG, crested wheatgrass • IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility • IWG, intermediate wheatgrass • NDF, neutral detergent fiber • SBG, smooth bromegrass • WWG, western wheatgrass




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
G. E. Brink, M. D. Casler, and M. B. Hall
Canopy Structure and Neutral Detergent Fiber Differences among Temperate Perennial Grasses
Crop Sci., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 2182 - 2189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy.